-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
Move from matplotlib 3.8 to 3.9 #38435
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move from matplotlib 3.8 to 3.9 #38435
Conversation
a12beb7
to
802f2a1
Compare
👋 Hi, @peterfpeterson, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
802f2a1
to
bc5e77a
Compare
The other checks that the 3d view is cubic remain
bc5e77a
to
e512861
Compare
Change listed in mpl 3.9 release notes https://matplotlib.org/3.9.0/api/prev_api_changes/api_changes_3.9.0.html#line2d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Played about with some plots, used Slice Viewer a bit, everything seemed to work, just needs some release notes I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for doing the release note
This is a squash of mantidproject#38435 Modify test that bounding box is bigger than the shape The other checks that the 3d view is cubic remain Fix IntegratePeaksSkew 'x must be a sequence' Change listed in mpl 3.9 release notes https://matplotlib.org/3.9.0/api/prev_api_changes/api_changes_3.9.0.html#line2d Update release note to include link for matplotlib 3.9
With the move to numpy v2 in #38420, we can move to the latest stable of release of matplotlib. According to the matplotlib 3.9 notes on runtime dependencies, qt5 is still supported. Let's see what happens.
Link to changes in matplotlib 3.9
There is no associated issue but this is associated with EWM8431
To test:
Probably should do some quick testing of things that rely on matplotlib like SliceViewer, otherwise if the tests pass it should be good to go.
Reviewer
Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.
Code Review
Functional Tests
Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of
@mantidproject/gatekeepers
will take care of it.Gatekeeper
If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.