Skip to content

Conversation

peterfpeterson
Copy link
Member

@peterfpeterson peterfpeterson commented Apr 21, 2025

When starting to work to migrate from centos7 to alma9 (mantidproject/dockerfiles#111), some tests failed as seen in build 205. The failing tests (in case the log disappears) are SystemTests.SNSPowderRedux.PG3Analysis, SystemTests.SNSPowderRedux.PG3StripPeaks, and SystemTests.BayesQuasiTest.BayesQuasiTest. This fixes the SNSPowderRedux tests by updating the reference results after manually inspecting them.

There is also a minor change to the test which reduces the runtime of the test by 2-3 seconds.

There is no associated issue, but this is related to EWM10130

To test:

Since this is updating system tests, they should pass.

This does not require release notes because it is only updating a system test.


Reviewer

Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.

Code Review

  • Is the code of an acceptable quality?
  • Does the code conform to the coding standards?
  • Are the unit tests small and test the class in isolation?
  • If there is GUI work does it follow the GUI standards?
  • If there are changes in the release notes then do they describe the changes appropriately?
  • Do the release notes conform to the release notes guide?

Functional Tests

  • Do changes function as described? Add comments below that describe the tests performed?
  • Do the changes handle unexpected situations, e.g. bad input?
  • Has the relevant (user and developer) documentation been added/updated?

Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of @mantidproject/gatekeepers will take care of it.

Gatekeeper

If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.

@sf1919
Copy link
Contributor

sf1919 commented Apr 28, 2025

This has been tested on an alma9 runner and the SNS tests did pass - https://builds.mantidproject.org/job/Core_Team_test_pipeline/225/

The only failing test was BayesQuasiTest which is going to be fixed in a different PR

@sf1919
Copy link
Contributor

sf1919 commented May 1, 2025

Re-running Linux and systems tests on an alam9 node specifically - https://builds.mantidproject.org/job/pull_requests-conda-linux/11942/

@thomashampson thomashampson self-assigned this May 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@thomashampson thomashampson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks to me like the test is working fine when running on Alma9.

@sf1919 sf1919 self-assigned this May 1, 2025
@sf1919 sf1919 marked this pull request as ready for review May 1, 2025 15:09
@sf1919 sf1919 merged commit 1c3b11d into mantidproject:main May 1, 2025
10 checks passed
glass-ships pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
When starting to work to migrate from centos7 to alma9
(mantidproject/dockerfiles#111), some tests
failed as seen in [build
205](https://builds.mantidproject.org/job/Core_Team_test_pipeline/205/).
The failing tests (in case the log disappears) are
`SystemTests.SNSPowderRedux.PG3Analysis`,
`SystemTests.SNSPowderRedux.PG3StripPeaks`, and
`SystemTests.BayesQuasiTest.BayesQuasiTest`. This fixes the
SNSPowderRedux tests by updating the reference results after manually
inspecting them.

There is also a minor change to the test which reduces the runtime of
the test by 2-3 seconds.
glass-ships pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2025
Bringing in changes from:
* #39262
* #39231

---------

Co-authored-by: Pete Peterson <petersonpf@ornl.gov>
Co-authored-by: thomashampson <thomas.hampson@stfc.ac.uk>
@sf1919 sf1919 added this to the Release 6.13 milestone May 15, 2025
@peterfpeterson peterfpeterson deleted the snspowderredux_alma9 branch October 1, 2025 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants