-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
Update miniforge #39272
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update miniforge #39272
Conversation
👋 Hi, @thomashampson, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
0c05ce3
to
e083bcb
Compare
👋 Hi, @thomashampson, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
Mambaforge no longer exists, so rename all instances.
e083bcb
to
5c86082
Compare
OSX rebuild is waiting in the queue |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks for updating the python version
Mambaforge was replaced by miniforge ([reference](https://github.com/conda-forge/miniforge?tab=readme-ov-file#whats-the-difference-between-mambaforge-and-miniforge)). Here we update to a newer version, and rename any instances for consistency. Co-authored-by: James Clarke <james.clarke@stfc.ac.uk> Co-authored-by: sf1919 <sarah.foxley@stfc.ac.uk>
This gets the following into `ornl-next` * #39272 * #39744 --------- Co-authored-by: thomashampson <thomas.hampson@stfc.ac.uk> Co-authored-by: James Clarke <james.clarke@stfc.ac.uk> Co-authored-by: sf1919 <sarah.foxley@stfc.ac.uk> Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Description of work
Mambaforge was replaced by miniforge (reference). Here we update to a newer version, and rename any instances for consistency.
Fixes #38848
To test:
Ensure that this test package build passes on all OS:

This does not require release notes because it's an internal update to build tools.
Reviewer
Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.
Code Review
Functional Tests
Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of
@mantidproject/gatekeepers
will take care of it.Gatekeeper
If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.