Skip to content

Conversation

searscr
Copy link
Contributor

@searscr searscr commented Jul 22, 2025

Sister merge to #39686

Reviewer

Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.

Code Review

  • Is the code of an acceptable quality?
  • Does the code conform to the coding standards?
  • Are the unit tests small and test the class in isolation?
  • If there is GUI work does it follow the GUI standards?
  • If there are changes in the release notes then do they describe the changes appropriately?
  • Do the release notes conform to the release notes guide?

Functional Tests

  • Do changes function as described? Add comments below that describe the tests performed?
  • Do the changes handle unexpected situations, e.g. bad input?
  • Has the relevant (user and developer) documentation been added/updated?

Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of @mantidproject/gatekeepers will take care of it.

Gatekeeper

If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.

@searscr searscr enabled auto-merge (squash) July 22, 2025 23:12
@searscr searscr merged commit 414f601 into ornl-next Jul 23, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
@searscr searscr deleted the SaveNXSPE_ornl-next branch July 23, 2025 00:49
@sf1919 sf1919 added the ornl-next A copy of a branch into the ornl-next fork label Jul 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ornl-next A copy of a branch into the ornl-next fork
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants