Skip to content

Implement children prop for Switch for Fabric #14554

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
HariniMalothu17 opened this issue Apr 16, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Implement children prop for Switch for Fabric #14554

HariniMalothu17 opened this issue Apr 16, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
Area: Fabric Support Facebook Fabric Area: Switch enhancement Needs: Author Feedback The issue/PR needs activity from its author (label drives bot activity) New Architecture Broad category for issues that apply to the RN "new" architecture of Turbo Modules + Fabric no-recent-activity Issue/PR has gone stale and may be closed (label applied by bot) Workstream: Component Parity Close the parity gap between RNW and RN for core RN components and their supporting APIs.
Milestone
Backlog

Comments

@HariniMalothu17
Copy link
Contributor

HariniMalothu17 commented Apr 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Implement children prop for switch for fabric
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Needs: Triage 🔍 New issue that needs to be reviewed by the issue management team (label applied by bot) label Apr 16, 2025
@chiaramooney
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure if the Switch component should support the "children" prop. @danielayala94 do you have more information on if Switch should support this prop?

@chiaramooney chiaramooney added this to the Backlog milestone Apr 17, 2025
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the New Architecture Broad category for issues that apply to the RN "new" architecture of Turbo Modules + Fabric label Apr 17, 2025
@chiaramooney chiaramooney added Workstream: Component Parity Close the parity gap between RNW and RN for core RN components and their supporting APIs. Needs: Author Feedback The issue/PR needs activity from its author (label drives bot activity) and removed Needs: Triage 🔍 New issue that needs to be reviewed by the issue management team (label applied by bot) labels Apr 17, 2025
@microsoft-github-policy-service Microsoft GitHub Policy Service
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been marked as requiring author feedback but has not had any activity for 7 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days of this comment.

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the no-recent-activity Issue/PR has gone stale and may be closed (label applied by bot) label May 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Area: Fabric Support Facebook Fabric Area: Switch enhancement Needs: Author Feedback The issue/PR needs activity from its author (label drives bot activity) New Architecture Broad category for issues that apply to the RN "new" architecture of Turbo Modules + Fabric no-recent-activity Issue/PR has gone stale and may be closed (label applied by bot) Workstream: Component Parity Close the parity gap between RNW and RN for core RN components and their supporting APIs.
Projects
RNW New Architecture
Status: No status
Milestone
Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@chiaramooney @HariniMalothu17