Skip to content

customized reviewed file types #25

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

customized reviewed file types #25

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vstars1
Copy link
Collaborator

@vstars1 vstars1 commented Mar 17, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new configuration option to manage and customize the list of file extensions subject to review.
  • Refactor

    • Updated the file review process to reference the configurable list instead of fixed values, enhancing flexibility and maintainability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 17, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new configuration variable, reviewed_file_types, to categorize file extensions for review. The configuration file now includes a "Customized reviewed file type" section with this list. Additionally, the file processing logic in the default review handler has been modified to import and use the new variable instead of a hardcoded list. The changes allow external management of file type filtering without altering the overall control flow.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
config/config.py, review_engine/.../default_handler.py Added new variable reviewed_file_types under a dedicated section in the config file and updated the handler to import and use this variable for file type checking.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant R as Review Engine
    participant H as Default Handler
    participant C as Config Module

    R->>H: Process file change (with file path)
    H->>C: Import reviewed_file_types
    C-->>H: Return list of reviewed file extensions
    H->>H: Validate file extension against reviewed_file_types
    H-->>R: Proceed based on validation
Loading

Poem

I'm a bouncy rabbit, code in my sight,
Hoppping through config with pure delight.
A new file filter now leads the way,
Guiding reviews in a smart new display.
With every hop, the code feels light,
CodeRabbit celebrates this change—oh, what a sight!
🐰✨

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
config/config.py (1)

74-76: LGTM: Good move to externalize file types configuration!

Moving the file type definitions to a configurable list is a great improvement for maintainability. This change allows for easier management of supported file types without modifying the handler code.

One minor suggestion: Consider using consistent string quotes (either all single quotes or all double quotes) in the file extensions list. Currently, ".go" uses double quotes while the others use single quotes.

-reviewed_file_types = ['.py', '.java', '.class', '.vue', ".go"]
+reviewed_file_types = ['.py', '.java', '.class', '.vue', '.go']
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ee2b0a and ce773fe.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • config/config.py (1 hunks)
  • review_engine/handler/default_handler.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
review_engine/handler/default_handler.py (2)

6-6: LGTM: Good import of the new configuration variable.

The import of reviewed_file_types from the config module is correctly implemented.


25-25: LGTM: Properly using the configurable file types.

Successfully replaced the hardcoded file extensions list with the imported configuration variable. This change improves the code's maintainability by centralizing the configuration in one place.

@mimo-x
Copy link
Owner

mimo-x commented Mar 25, 2025

x

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants