feat: boolean schemas support enum #351
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
adds support for the `enum` keyword to `boolean` schemas, which is handy for creating discriminated unions on ocassion. requested by Mark
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
adds support for the
enumkeyword tobooleanschemas, which is handy for creating discriminated unions on occasion.after this change a schema like:
will only allow
trueto be passed, vice-versa forfalse.I've opted to not include the normal enum open/closed concept here as it seems a bit unnecessary when the enums domain can only contain two values at most - If open enums are expected to be needed then you should probably be using a
stringornumberenum.requested by @markios