Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 3, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
remark-cli (source) 11.0.0 -> 12.0.1 age confidence
remark-lint (source) 9.1.1 -> 10.0.1 age confidence

Release Notes

remarkjs/remark (remark-cli)

v12.0.1

Compare Source

v12.0.0

Compare Source

(see 15.0.0)

remarkjs/remark-lint (remark-lint)

v10.0.1

Compare Source

(this is also a patch release for all packages)

Types
  • cd07d38 Refactor internal types for better option coercion
  • 0c3b4c8 Add type for callback-style async rule
  • 70f5120 Fix for changes in typescript
  • ea19649 Refactor to use @import
Miscellaneous

Full Changelog: remarkjs/remark-lint@10.0.0...10.0.1

v10.0.0

Compare Source

(this is a major for each package maintained here)

Change
  • 943a574 Change to require Node.js 16
    migrate: update too
  • 625f7f9 Change to use exports
    migrate: don’t use private APIs
  • 255ca39 Update unified, @types/mdast, etc
    migrate: update too
  • 8df41b3 remark-preset-lint-recommended: change to prefer remark-lint-list-item-indent: 'one'
    migrate: pass tab if you want previous behavior
  • 63d132d remark-preset-lint-consistent: add remark-lint-ordered-list-marker-value
    migrate: turn off or configure with what you prefer
  • ccea691 remark-list-item-indent: change default to one
    migrate: pass tab if you want previous behavior
  • 07140bd remark-list-item-indent: rename space to one, tab-size to tab
  • 7ca5d3c unified-lint-rule: rename RuleMeta type to Meta
  • 906012e Remove deprecated (pre CommonMark) remark-lint-no-inline-padding
  • 9cdda80 Remove deprecated (pre CommonMark) remark-lint-no-auto-link-without-protocol
Add
  • 45aeac2 Add better messages, rewrite and improve rules
  • 655ba54 Add better support for gfm, directives, math, mdx
  • 18e669f remark-lint-file-extension: add option to disallow extensionless
  • 4057f15 remark-lint-no-empty-url: add check for #
Fix
  • 802f78f remark-lint-table-pipe-alignment: fix empty centered cell
Docs
Misc

Full Changelog: remarkjs/remark-lint@9.1.2...10.0.0

v9.1.2

Compare Source

Fix
  • 639271a Fix table alignment related rules for micromark changes
    (remark-lint-table-cell-padding, remark-lint-table-pipe-alignment)
  • 5bdc23b Check urls from definitions
    (remark-lint-no-empty-url) by @​Xunnamius in #​299
Misc

Full Changelog: remarkjs/remark-lint@9.1.1...9.1.2


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from moul as a code owner December 3, 2023 10:49
@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot added the 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet label Dec 3, 2023
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Dec 3, 2023

New, updated, and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/remark-cli@12.0.1 🔁 npm/remark-cli@11.0.0 Transitive: environment, filesystem, shell, unsafe +162 10.5 MB wooorm
npm/remark-lint@10.0.1 🔁 npm/remark-lint@9.1.1 Transitive: environment +56 1.67 MB wooorm

View full report↗︎

@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency remark-cli to v12 fix(deps): update remark (major) Apr 9, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-remark branch from 857e299 to 984316b Compare April 9, 2024 17:17
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-remark branch from 984316b to df4cfe7 Compare April 30, 2024 13:48
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-remark branch from df4cfe7 to bfce1fb Compare January 27, 2025 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants