Are different cell counting methods used?

[mockoocy]

In SampleViewContainer component there is a property

mxcubeweb/ui/src/containers/SampleViewContainer.jsx

Line 245 in 6bf391b

cellCounting: state.taskForm.defaultParameters.mesh.cell_counting,

which is set in the beamline_config.yml - under the default_acquisition_parameters.mesh key:

mxcubeweb/demo.yaml/beamline_config.yml

Line 121 in 6bf391b

cell_counting: zig-zag

Which is then retrieved and stored like so:

mxcubeweb/mxcubeweb/core/components/queue.py

Lines 2212 to 2233 in 6bf391b

	return {
	"acq_parameters": {
	**acq_parameters,
	"inverse_beam": False,
	"take_dark_current": True,
	"skip_existing_images": False,
	"take_snapshots": HWR.beamline.collect.get_property(
	"num_snapshots", self.app.DEFAULT_NUM_SNAPSHOTS
	),
	"helical": False,
	"mesh": False,
	"prefixTemplate": "{PREFIX}_{POSITION}",
	"subDirTemplate": "{ACRONYM}/{ACRONYM}-{NAME}",
	"experiment_type": "",
	},
	"limits": HWR.beamline.config.acquisition_limit_values,
	"requires": requires if requires else [],
	"name": display_name if display_name else task_name,
	"queue_entry": task_name,
	"schema": schema,
	"ui_schema": ui_schema,
	}

mxcubeweb/ui/src/actions/login.js

Lines 116 to 118 in 6bf391b

	fetchAvailableTasks()
	.then((taskParameters) => ({ taskParameters }))
	.catch(notify),

mxcubeweb/ui/src/reducers/taskForm.js

Lines 34 to 41 in 6bf391b

	case 'SET_INITIAL_STATE': {
	return {
	...state,
	defaultParameters: {
	...action.data.taskParameters,
	},
	fileSuffix: action.data.detector.fileSuffix,
	};

That is: the cellCounting should be read like so:

 cellCounting: state.taskForm.defaultParameters.mesh.acq_parameters.cell_counting, 

Currently it seems to be always set to undefined. It also seems to be this way for a long time (at least 3 years I think, probably since this commit: 8bdec8e )

I wonder if perhaps this is no longer used? If so, I could remove references to it (it's currently used only in DrawGridPlugin).
In other case; I guess I will make it be read in a way I've mentioned above.

---

Related comment: #1808 (comment)