Hide the processing section of "Tasks" dialogs based on backend configuration

[alessandro-olivo]

This feature allows hiding the "processing" section in the Task dialogs (i.e. DataCollection, Helical, and Mesh) based on the new acquisition parameter disable_processing that can be configured from the backend.

HowTo

Update your beamline_config.yaml file like this:

   ...
  default_acquisition_parameters:
    default:
      ...
      take_snapshots: true
      sub_wedge_size: 10
+     disable_processing: false
      ...

      helical:
        # Defaults for helical scan. Missing values are taken from default
        number_of_images: 100
+       disable_processing: true

The first disable_processing: false is not actually needed since "false" is the default value when not explicitly set in this file.

Requirements

⚠️ This PR depends on mxcube/mxcubecore#1331 (merge this first)

[walesch-yan]

Since this depends on mxcube/mxcubecore#1331, which has been merged by now, could you update the version of mxcubecore in pyproject.toml to the one that includes your backend changes? (should be 1.335.0)

Afterwards, I guess you can rebase and merge:)

[marcus-oscarsson]

Perfect, yes please go-ahead and re-base and merge

[alessandro-olivo]

I've updated the tests, but there's still an issue with the CI checks. I think it might be related to the configuration, since the warning says: Set the SONAR_TOKEN env variable.

[walesch-yan]

To me it seems that the problem is not directly the configuration, but the SonarQube token is needed for running the SonarQube CI. The token itself is set in the repo's secrets for the action to pick it up. However, GitHub is not passing secrets to a fork; hence, you cannot run the workflow on your PR, but it runs on all PRs done from a branch inside the repo. However, it will correctly run when we push the changes to develop.

This is indeed a problem, we have not thought about when introducing it recently #1774 . As of now, I recon we can ignore it, the check is not required to pass anyways. Then we probably need to find a solution like only running it on a push.

[walesch-yan]

Sorry, I was merging the current open PRs but should have started with this one. Could you rebase again @alessandro-olivo ?

[alessandro-olivo]

@marcus-oscarsson Done! :)

[walesch-yan]

Thanks @alessandro-olivo