Skip to content

Conversation

@nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Jan 30, 2025

Bumps nanoFramework.CoreLibrary from 1.15.5 to 1.16.1
Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.49 to 3.0.57

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated dependency versions for nanoFramework libraries
    • Upgraded nanoFramework.CoreLibrary from version 1.15.5 to 1.16.1
    • Upgraded nanoFramework.TestFramework from version 3.0.49 to 3.0.57

Bumps nanoFramework.CoreLibrary from 1.15.5 to 1.16.1</br>Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.49 to 3.0.57</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request involves updating dependency versions across multiple packages.lock.json files for the .NETnanoFramework project. The primary changes include upgrading two key dependencies: nanoFramework.CoreLibrary from version 1.15.5 to 1.16.1, and nanoFramework.TestFramework from version 3.0.49 to 3.0.57. These updates are consistently applied across test project directories (HashtableTests, QueueTests, StackTests) and the System.Collections package, reflecting a systematic library version upgrade.

Changes

File Change Summary
Tests/HashtableTests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.CoreLibrary to 1.16.1 and nanoFramework.TestFramework to 3.0.57
Tests/QueueTests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.CoreLibrary to 1.16.1 and nanoFramework.TestFramework to 3.0.57
Tests/StackTests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.CoreLibrary to 1.16.1 and nanoFramework.TestFramework to 3.0.57
nanoFramework.System.Collections/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.CoreLibrary to 1.16.1

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d915b97 and 5a59179.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (10)
  • Tests/HashtableTests/HashtableTests.cs is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/HashtableTests/HashtableTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/HashtableTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/QueueTests/QueueTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/QueueTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/StackTests/StackTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/StackTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.System.Collections.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.System.Collections/nanoFramework.System.Collections.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.System.Collections/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • Tests/HashtableTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • Tests/QueueTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • Tests/StackTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • nanoFramework.System.Collections/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • nanoFramework.System.Collections/packages.lock.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: nanoFramework / NuGets using latest version
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Tests/HashtableTests/packages.lock.json (1)

7-9: LGTM! Dependency updates are consistent.

The updates to both dependencies are properly specified with exact version ranges and matching content hashes:

  • nanoFramework.CoreLibrary: 1.15.5 → 1.16.1 (minor version bump)
  • nanoFramework.TestFramework: 3.0.49 → 3.0.57 (patch version bump)

Also applies to: 13-15

Tests/StackTests/packages.lock.json (1)

7-9: LGTM! Updates match other test projects.

The dependency updates are consistent with HashtableTests.

Also applies to: 13-15

Tests/QueueTests/packages.lock.json (1)

7-9: LGTM! Updates are consistent across all test projects.

The dependency updates match other test projects. Since these are automated updates, it would be good to verify the changelog/release notes for these versions:

  • nanoFramework.CoreLibrary 1.16.1
  • nanoFramework.TestFramework 3.0.57

Also applies to: 13-15


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@nfbot nfbot merged commit a354bf3 into main Jan 30, 2025
6 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/579fa264-d15b-4371-b464-fc2f1d38fca3 branch January 30, 2025 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants