Skip to content

Expand session token statuses #289

@carpawell

Description

@carpawell

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I'm always frustrated when I see regular problems but cannot assign some well-known status to them. Session token is a good well-structed candidate. We did it once: #191. Now we also have validation on the SN side and now such errors can be seen by a user: nspcc-dev/neofs-node#2731, nspcc-dev/neofs-node#2727.

Describe the solution you'd like

Possible status codes:

  1. Wrong token issuer/not signed by container owner
  2. Invalid signature
  3. Wrong session operation
  4. Wrong container

Describe alternatives you've considered

Not sure all of them (or any of them) are required and having a separate code for them can make user's life easier but for the tests a well structured response for such an important NeoFS part may look pretty.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    I2Regular impactS2Regular significanceU4Nothing urgentfeatureCompletely new functionality

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions