Skip to content

Conversation

Arhell
Copy link
Member

@Arhell Arhell commented Oct 6, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@SeanKilleen SeanKilleen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm torn on this. On one hand, updating things seems good. On the other, my feeling is that the legacy docs are frozen in time and a little bit of link rot there may not be the worst thing. This PR isn't linked to a discussion.

@OsirisTerje , thoughts?

@OsirisTerje
Copy link
Member

Agree the docs are "frozen in time", so I wouldn't bother fixing old links, but when this is done, so - it does no harm either. As long as we don't go chasing more broken links in old stuff.

Copy link
Member Author

@Arhell Arhell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

close

@Arhell Arhell closed this Oct 18, 2025
@Arhell Arhell deleted the license branch October 18, 2025 06:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants