[mini.base16] "Strong" TS style missing

[alezunino]

Hi,
I have noticed that when using mini.base16 colors, some words lack bold style compared to other colorschemes such as catppuccin, using TreeSitter supported languages such as Markdown. This can be fixed by adding this line to base16.lua:
hi('Strong', {fg=nil, bg=nil, attr='bold', sp=nil})

I am not sure whether this is a bug or it is the expected formatting, but I prefer the way catppuccin displays in bold some words.

thanks

[echasnovski]

Hello!

I am not sure where Strong highlight group comes from. I've never noticed it defined.

There is Bold highlight group which can be served same purpose.

[alezunino]

Hi!
I was not clear. This is a short markdown file where strong is shown in bold using the catppuccin colorscheme:
catppuccin

This is the same file using minicyan (bold is not shown):
minicyan

Finally, using minicyan patched (bold is ok):
https://i.postimg.cc/MGHxLdz9/minicyan-text-strong.png

This is the code I added to mini.base16:
hi('@text.strong', {fg=nil, bg=nil, attr='bold', sp=nil})

In catppuccin there are several @text hl groups such as this that are not present in mini.base16.

[echasnovski]

I see now, thanks! 'mini.base16' only mildly interferes with tree-sitter, 'mini.hues' has more effect there. But both of them don't create @text.strong. I'll add it (hopefully, tomorrow).

[echasnovski]

@alezunino, this (along with @text.emphasis and @text.strike) should now be on main branch. Thanks for noticing this! Markdown support is now much better!

[alezunino]

Awesome!!!! thanks for this amazing set of plugins!

BTW, I am using mini.base16 to generate a colorscheme based on the currently configured WezTerm theme. Once I test it properly I will share the code.

thanks again!