Add/improve treesitter markdown support #98
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
resolves #95
I did notice recently that highlighting for treesitter was not working as expected. I have added this support and I believe it should maintain the same style as the regular syntax highlighting. I have checked links, embedded code etc in a couple of online sample markdown.md docs. Note there is a single reference to an lsp...markdown group. Without this change there were a few instances where the square braces around links or ids were in red with the ids another color, and it just didnt look like the 'oxocarbon' way. Please adjust to your liking of course!!!!
Note couple of screenshots with conceal enabled/disabled, links, embedded code.