-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8361140: Missing OptimizePtrCompare check in ConnectionGraph::reduce_phi_on_cmp #26125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f118400
8361140: Missing OptimizePtrCompare check in ConnectionGraph::reduce_…
hgqxjj 787eb0c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 8361140
hgqxjj 2feca6a
update modification and add regression test
hgqxjj 6dda1e9
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 8361140
hgqxjj fd6f90f
update regression test
hgqxjj 4ef7ed3
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 8361140
hgqxjj 0e9aa95
Remove the unused variable
hgqxjj File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for working on this! IIUC, having the bailout here will fail to reduce the phi which could be unexpected. Shouldn't we just return
UNKNOWN
from withinConnectionGraph::optimize_ptr_compare()
when we run withoutOptimizePtrCompare
?On a separate note, can you also add a regression test? Maybe you can also just add a run with
-XX:-OptimizePtrCompare
- maybe together with-XX:+VerifyReduceAllocationMerges
for more verification - tocompiler/c2/irTests/scalarReplacement/AllocationMergesTests.java
.@JohnTortugo you might also want to have a look at this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for your suggestion!
I took a closer look at the code, and I now fully agree that your approach is the better one. Returning UNKNOWN from optimize_ptr_compare() when OptimizePtrCompare is disabled makes the behavior more consistent and avoids skipping reduce_phi_on_cmp() entirely, which could lead to unexpected results or missed optimization opportunities. I appreciate your feedback and will move forward with this approach. Thanks again!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the ping @chhagedorn and I fully agree with your comment. Actually, that's the correct way to do this.
Thank you for fixing this @hgqxjj .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hi @chhagedorn , I already update PR and add regression test. Please take another look when you have time .
Thanks a lot.