Skip to content

8361706: Parallel weak klass link cleaning does not clean out previous klasses #26263

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl commented Jul 11, 2025

Hi all,

please review this fix to parallel weak klass link cleaning.

KlassCleaningTask::work() misses cleaning out previous versions of klasses (created by JVMTI class redefinition) as the regular single-threaded variant would do when calling Klass::clean_weak_klass_links() with clean_live_klasses = true.

The fix moves the cleaning of weak klass links for previous versions of the klass into InstanceKlass::clean_weak_instanceklass_links().

Testing: gha, tier1-5, many runs of vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/RedefineClasses/StressRedefine/TestDescription.java(with JDK-8361952 also out for review)

Thanks,
Thomas


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8361706: Parallel weak klass link cleaning does not clean out previous klasses (Bug - P2)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26263/head:pull/26263
$ git checkout pull/26263

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26263
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26263/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26263

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26263

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26263.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

tschatzl added 4 commits July 10, 2025 17:04
Hi all,

  please review this fix to parallel weak klass link cleaning.

`KlassCleaningTask::work()` misses cleaning out previous versions of klasses (created by JVMTI class redefinition) as the regular single-threaded variant would do when calling `Klass::clean_weak_klass_links()` with `clean_live_klasses = true`.

The fix moves the cleaning of weak klass links for previous versions of the klass into `InstanceKlass::clean_weak_instanceklass_links()`.

Testing: gha, tier1-5

Thanks,
  Thomas
@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label add hotspot-gc
/label add hotspot-runtime

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 11, 2025

👋 Welcome back tschatzl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 11, 2025

@tschatzl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8361706: Parallel weak klass link cleaning does not clean out previous klasses

Reviewed-by: eosterlund, coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 13 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8361706 8361706: Parallel weak klass link cleaning does not clean out previous klasses Jul 11, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org labels Jul 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 11, 2025

@tschatzl
The hotspot-gc label was successfully added.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 11, 2025

@tschatzl
The hotspot-runtime label was successfully added.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 11, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you make InstanceKlass::clean_weak_instanceklass_links() protected? If not, this looks good.

@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you make InstanceKlass::clean_weak_instanceklass_links() protected? If not, this looks good.

It is required to be public right now.

Thanks @coleenp @fisk for your reviews

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Going to push as commit 99c299f.
Since your change was applied there have been 29 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 14, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 14, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 14, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 14, 2025

@tschatzl Pushed as commit 99c299f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants