Skip to content

8356587: Missing object ID X in pool jdk.types.Method #26458

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mgronlun
Copy link

@mgronlun mgronlun commented Jul 24, 2025

Greetings,

The following change set addresses the data loss resulting in the assertion "Missing object ID X in pool jdk.types.Method".

It involves three components:

  1. Address a regression introduced by JDK-835221. By locating JFR_ONLY(Jfr::check_and_process_sample_request(thread);) before the global_poll() in SafepointMechanism::process(), a stacktrace can be captured, and artifacts tagged, during a safepoint. This breaks an invariant as artifacts, i.e. methods, can be tagged in the wrong epoch (also a stacktrace can be stored in the wrong epoch). Must be moved to post global_poll().

  2. Retransform/Redefine classes include a non-safe copy of Method trace flags, leading to stale bits being set onto the new Methods. Method trace flags need to be copied, but must be done under a safepoint.

  3. It seems that there has been an increase in the frequency of issuing calls to InstanceKlass::purge_previous_versions(), making scratch klasses and old methods disappear before JFR gets the chance to serialize also tagged old methods. Therefore, we need to ensure that we always tag the latest version of a Method.

There is also a cleanup of gratuitous type conversions, from Klass* to InstanceKlass* in the newly introduced MethodTracing subsystem.

Testing: jdk_jfr, stress testing

Thank you
Markus


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8356587: Missing object ID X in pool jdk.types.Method (Bug - P2)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26458/head:pull/26458
$ git checkout pull/26458

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26458
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26458/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26458

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26458

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26458.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 24, 2025

👋 Welcome back mgronlun! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 24, 2025

@mgronlun This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8356587: Missing object ID X in pool jdk.types.Method

Reviewed-by: egahlin

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 75 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 24, 2025

@mgronlun The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org labels Jul 24, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Webrevs

@mgronlun
Copy link
Author

/label remove hotspot

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 24, 2025

@mgronlun
The hotspot label was successfully removed.

@mgronlun
Copy link
Author

/label add hotspot-jfr

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-jfr hotspot-jfr-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 24, 2025

@mgronlun
The hotspot-jfr label was successfully added.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-jfr hotspot-jfr-dev@openjdk.org ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants