Fix FileInterceptor's delete calls for Unix Domain Sockets on Windows

[reta]

Description

Fix FileInterceptor's delete calls for Unix Domain Sockets on Windows

Related Issues

See please https://github.com/opensearch-project/custom-codecs/actions/runs/14370198700/job/40291704566?pr=235

Check List

• Functionality includes testing.
• API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
• Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[github-actions]

❌ Gradle check result for a10b502: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[cwperks]

For one of the failing flaky tests in the latest run, I had opened a PR to fix a reproducible seed: #17389

[kumargu]

For one of the failed tests in the latest run, I had opened a PR to fix for a reproducible seed: #17389

DedicatedClusterSnapshotRestoreIT.testSnapshotWithStuckNode one has been failing for ages.

But org.opensearch.indexing.IndexActionIT.testAutoGenerateIdNoDuplicates {p0={"cluster.indices.replication.strategy":"SEGMENT"}} seems new.

[cwperks]

For one of the failed tests in the latest run, I had opened a PR to fix for a reproducible seed: #17389

DedicatedClusterSnapshotRestoreIT.testSnapshotWithStuckNode one has been failing for ages.

But org.opensearch.indexing.IndexActionIT.testAutoGenerateIdNoDuplicates {p0={"cluster.indices.replication.strategy":"SEGMENT"}} seems new.

I have seen IndexActionIT.testAutoGenerateIdNoDuplicates errors in a few PRs. There's an open PR to address that flaky test as well: #17606

[github-actions]

❌ Gradle check result for a10b502: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[github-actions]

❌ Gradle check result for a10b502: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[github-actions]

✅ Gradle check result for a10b502: SUCCESS

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 36 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.45%. Comparing base (7b6108b) to head (a10b502).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...java/org/opensearch/javaagent/FileInterceptor.java	0.00%	36 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main   #17873   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     72.44%   72.45%           
- Complexity    66483    66504   +21     
=========================================
  Files          5409     5409           
  Lines        308282   308266   -16     
  Branches      44759    44753    -6     
=========================================
- Hits         223344   223340    -4     
+ Misses        66608    66597   -11     
+ Partials      18330    18329    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[reta]

@cwperks @andrross mind please re-approving? thank you