-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 307
fix(input): modify mobile problem #2671
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the input component's renderless implementation, focusing on changing the Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
[e2e-test-warn] The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug". Please make sure you've read our contributing guide |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/theme-mobile/src/input/index.less (1)
36-37
: Consider using CSS variables for border properties.While the border styling improves visual feedback, consider using CSS variables for the border color and radius to maintain consistency with the theme system.
- border: 1px solid #c2c2c2; - border-radius: 8px; + border: 1px solid var(--ti-mobile-input-border-color); + border-radius: var(--ti-mobile-input-radius);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/mobile/components/input/src/renderless/index.ts
(1 hunks)packages/mobile/components/input/src/renderless/vue.ts
(1 hunks)packages/theme-mobile/src/input/index.less
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/theme-mobile/src/input/index.less (1)
34-34
: LGTM: Vertical resize improves mobile UX.
Restricting resize to vertical only is a good practice for mobile interfaces, preventing horizontal scrolling issues.
packages/mobile/components/input/src/renderless/vue.ts (1)
205-205
: LGTM: Parameter update aligns with component architecture.
The change from parent
to vm
for accessing slots is more aligned with Vue's component architecture, as it directly uses the component instance.
packages/mobile/components/input/src/renderless/index.ts (1)
394-396
: Verify slot accessibility after parameter change.
While the change from parent
to vm
is logical, we should verify that slot access works correctly in all scenarios.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate additional verification scripts to ensure we have a complete understanding of the slot access patterns and their consistency.
Let me try one more verification to specifically check the input component's structure and slot handling.
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide the final response:
Slot access change from parent
to vm
is correctly implemented and safe.
The change from parent.$slots
to vm.$slots
in the suffix slot check is verified to be correct because:
- The component follows Vue's standard slot access patterns
- The same pattern is consistently used across the mobile input component
- The
vm
parameter is properly typed in theIInputRenderlessParams
interface - The suffix slot check is used in the
getSuffixVisible
function which is correctly bound to the component's context
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for slot usage patterns in the codebase
# Look for similar slot access patterns to ensure consistency
# Search for slot access patterns
rg -A 2 '\$slots\.suffix'
# Search for potential parent slot access that might need similar updates
rg -A 2 'parent\.\$slots'
Length of output: 3073
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the component structure and slot usage in the input components
# Check the input component implementation to understand slot handling
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
setup($$$) {
$$$
slots
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Look for slot-related props or interfaces
rg -A 3 'interface.*Input.*Props'
rg -A 3 'interface.*Input.*Params'
Length of output: 171
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the input component implementation and its slot handling
# Look for the input component file and its slot usage
rg -A 5 'setup.*\(' packages/mobile/components/input/src/
# Check for any slot-related type definitions or interfaces
rg -A 3 'type.*Input' packages/mobile/components/input/src/
rg -A 3 'interface.*Input' packages/mobile/components/input/src/
# Check the renderless implementation for slot handling
cat packages/mobile/components/input/src/renderless/index.ts
Length of output: 18149
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation