- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 47
Refactor and extend History class #552
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is  
 
 ... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
 | 
…regator returns scalars
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
…dev/optimagic into remote-history-arrays
| The new plotly version (6.0.0) seems to have a bug. I had to restrict it. I could not find a MRE quickly. However, I already found out that the problem stems from these lines: # plotting_utilities.py[100-106]
    if share_yrange_all:
        lb = []
        ub = []
        for f in plots:
            for d in f.data:
>               lb.append(np.min(d["y"]))
>               ub.append(np.max(d["y"]))The problem seems to be that  | 
HistoryArraysclass and add these methods toHistoryclasstimingmodule that contains functionality to createCostModels(as described Improve runtime measures for criterion plot and benchmarking plots #547)Historyclass, most importantlyfun_dataandparams_data, which return tidy data frames of the function evaluations and a user-selected time measure.Note
history_plots.py), we must wait for Align plotting from logs and results #553fun_dataandparams_datain the visualization code we will also wait for Align plotting from logs and results #553