-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
Update readme.md #8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughA single line, "In review...", was appended to the end of the README file. No other files or content were altered. Changes
Poem
Tip ⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
readme.md (1)
4-5
: Consider removing or rephrasing the placeholder text.
The lineIn review...
reads like a temporary note and may confuse readers. If you intend to convey the status of the PR, consider a more descriptive phrase (e.g., “Currently under review by the community”) or remove it entirely to keep the README focused on content.
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
readme.md
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
readme.md (1)
4-4
: This change is purely whitespace; no review comments needed here.
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ | |||
## GraphQL - The Future of Microservices? [](https://twitter.com/piotr_minkowski) | |||
|
|||
Detailed description can be found here: [GraphQL - The Future of Microservices?](https://piotrminkowski.com/2018/08/16/graphql-the-future-of-microservices/) | |||
|
|||
In review... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove ephemeral status line from README.
The appended "In review..." message appears intended for the PR process and can clutter the project's documentation long-term. Consider removing this line or moving it to a changelog or PR template for tracking review status instead.
@coderabbitai plan |
Caution CodeRabbit did not find changes to make. |
@coderabbitai please analyze the whole code and propose improvements in a commit |
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. |
Caution CodeRabbit did not find changes to make. |
@coderabbitai plan
Summary by CodeRabbit