-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
TC-DD-3.9: Remove #41485
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
TC-DD-3.9: Remove #41485
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request removes the test case TC-DD-3.9
. The changes involve deleting the test definition file src/app/tests/suites/certification/Test_TC_DD_3_9.yaml
and removing its corresponding entry from the src/app/tests/suites/manualTests.json
file. The changes are consistent and correctly execute the removal of the test case.
PR #41485: Size comparison from 809986e to 6062934 Full report (37 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, efr32, esp32, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, realtek, stm32, telink)
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #41485 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 51.01% 51.00% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 1385 1385
Lines 100969 100969
Branches 13073 13079 +6
==========================================
- Hits 51513 51500 -13
- Misses 49456 49469 +13 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Summary
Removes TC-DD-3.9. Please do not merge until test plan changes are approved. See test plan PR for explanation.
Related issues
https://github.com/CHIP-Specifications/chip-test-plans/pull/5625
Testing
Deletion only.
Readability checklist
The checklist below will help the reviewer finish PR review in time and keep the
code readable:
descriptive
“When in Rome…”
rule (coding style)
See: Pull Request Guidelines