You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, when using TiretestRig in Chrono to simulate tires and deformable surfaces, I output the slip ratio and found that the slip ratio calculation is only for braking conditions, i.e., s = wr/v - 1; whereas the slip ratio calculation when the tire is driven is s = 1 - v/wr. Here, s represents the slip ratio, w is the angular velocity of the tire, r is the tire radius, and v is the longitudinal speed of the tire. If I want to make modifications, where should I start?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There was a discussion related to this on the Chrono user forum (since people tend not to sign their posts, I don't know if that was you or someone else).
What I answered on the forum is that the definition of longitudinal slip is a matter of convention, as there is no universally accepted definition. In Chrono::Vehicle, we use the definition from SAE J670 (which is also used by other tools, such as Adams Car).
Here's a figure that shows the longitudinal slip with the formula used in Chrono, for different linear and angular velocities:
By the way, if you want to use a different formula, you can do so in the user-code, as you have access to all necessary quantities.
Hello, when using TiretestRig in Chrono to simulate tires and deformable surfaces, I output the slip ratio and found that the slip ratio calculation is only for braking conditions, i.e., s = wr/v - 1; whereas the slip ratio calculation when the tire is driven is s = 1 - v/wr. Here, s represents the slip ratio, w is the angular velocity of the tire, r is the tire radius, and v is the longitudinal speed of the tire. If I want to make modifications, where should I start?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: