Skip to content

[ExecuTorch][#10447] Extend PyBundledModule with extension.BundledModule #11737

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: gh/gasoonjia/16/base
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Gasoonjia
Copy link
Contributor

@Gasoonjia Gasoonjia commented Jun 16, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Context

This issue is a step of #9638.

In #9638, we want to have extension.Module as the single source of implementation in pybindings, which means that pybindings.PyModule should use extension.Module rather than its own pybindings.Module.

Proposal

Now that we have extension.BundledModule ready, we want to test it out by having our existing PyBundledModule to extend it, and let verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: D76751313

…Module`

# Context

This issue is a step of #9638.

In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`.

# Proposal

Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py
ghstack-source-id: 289817714
ghstack-source-id: 289817714
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D76751313](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76751313/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 16, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11737

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 16 New Failures, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit 9de5469 with merge base 057558f (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Gasoonjia added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
…Module`

# Context

This issue is a step of #9638.

In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`.

# Proposal

Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py
ghstack-source-id: 289817714
ghstack-source-id: 289817714
exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D76751313](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76751313/)

ghstack-source-id: 290750933
Pull Request resolved: #11737
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 16, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76751313

Copy link

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants