-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 340
Include test path in snaphot hints #2191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
If you're not testing the current directory/package. Fixes #1577
|
@schloerke could you please take a look and double check that this meets your needs? |
|
Need same logic in |
|
And the base reporter hints as well, please: Lines 147 to 148 in 71a33cd
|
|
@schloerke I don't think it makes sense to change that line — it is called when you're running |
Correct. Sorry for the false lead! |
|
@schloerke if the updated code doesn't help, can you please give me an example of how you're running the tests, and then I can iterate. |
|
With the latest... Two odd things:
PR: Expected: |
|
|
Where do I get shinyjster from? |
|
@schloerke I figured it out and made a bunch of fixes. Let me know how this version goes 😄 |
|
Outputs are tied directly to the test now. Thank you. CRAN -
|
R/snapshot.R
Outdated
|
|
||
| if (is.null(variant) || variant == "_default") { | ||
| name <- file | ||
| id <- c(file, name) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Q: The hint has changed from "Review the test file snapshots" to "Review this specific snapshot only", which causes work (delete the file name or many copy/paste's) to review more than one snapshot in a single test file. While the new code is accurate, it makes reviewing more time consuming.
I'd advocate for still returning the variant name for review.
Expected:
testthat::snapshot_review("mytest/", "inst/apps/001-hello/tests/testthat")
Not:testthat::snapshot_review("mytest/002.png", "inst/apps/001-hello/tests/testthat")
| id <- c(file, name) | |
| id <- file |
Or would it be possible to have the final comments suggest to review the test file's snaps.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ooooooh, I did wonder about that, but I thought that was the existing behaviour too. I removed the variant because it didn't work, but I think that's because it doesn't work when both file and variant are supplied.
(There's something about the code paths here that I find extremely confusing.)
If you're not testing the current directory/package.
Fixes #1577