- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 340
          Implement expect_disjoint()
          #2239
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
      
        
          +87
        
        
          −2
        
        
          
        
      
    
  
  
     Merged
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            8 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      25959a4
              
                add expect_not_contains() (#1851)
              
              
                stibu81 0d18c57
              
                add expect_not_in() (#1851)
              
              
                stibu81 86ef654
              
                update news
              
              
                stibu81 eb9eca6
              
                replace expect_not_in() and expect_not_contains() by expect_disjoint()
              
              
                stibu81 100e4e0
              
                resolve review comments from @DavisVaughan
              
              
                stibu81 3d32674
              
                Merged origin/main into stibu81-main
              
              
                hadley 2f5a8a4
              
                Update expectation style
              
              
                hadley e73be51
              
                More style tweaks
              
              
                hadley File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
      
    
  
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might be useful to have a test for
expect_disjoint(c("a", NA), NA)to test that missing values are matched exactly?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the review. I made the requested changes. In doing so, I might have stumbled onto something else:
expect_failure()does not succeed forexpect_disjoint()and some other functions in this file, e.g.:I think that the reason is that the call of
fail()is not insidereturn()for some functions, such that the laterpass()is also executed.expect_snapshot_failure()seems to be ok with this but notexpect_failure().I could fix those missing
return()s, but I'm not sure that it is good to mix this into this PR that is about something else.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@stibu81 that's because the expectation style has changed since you started working on this PR 😬 I've updated your expectation to the new style and
expect_failure(expect_in(3, 5))now correctly passes.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems I picked a bad moment for this... 😆 Thanks for fixing it.