-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 978
Support cum_sum(...).over(...)
expressions in cudf-polars
#19908
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support cum_sum(...).over(...)
expressions in cudf-polars
#19908
Conversation
Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually. Contributors can view more details about this message here. |
/ok to test d25e0c3 |
/ok to test ac65b75 |
/ok to test 2a7a8a8 |
/ok to test f1989a9 |
/ok to test 48fb152 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this makes sense to me with one small comment.
val_col = plc.copying.gather( | ||
plc.Table([val_col]), | ||
order_index, | ||
plc.copying.OutOfBoundsPolicy.NULLIFY, | ||
).columns()[0] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was resolved, but it seems not addressed (or explained why this would be a bad idea).
/merge |
Description
Contributes to #19200 by unblocking Q51
Checklist