Conversation
# Conflicts: # advanced/dapps/react-dapp-v2/pnpm-lock.yaml
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
8 Skipped Deployments
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR implements WalletConnect Pay functionality based on CAIP-358, adding comprehensive payment processing capabilities to both wallet and dapp sides with authentication support.
- Adds WalletConnect Pay support for wallet-to-dapp USDC transfers on multiple EVM chains
- Implements authentication message handling and verification across multiple blockchain namespaces
- Creates a dedicated POS terminal dapp for processing cryptocurrency payments
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 29 out of 44 changed files in this pull request and generated 8 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| advanced/wallets/react-wallet-v2/src/views/SessionProposalModal.tsx | Adds wallet pay UI components and authentication message handling |
| advanced/wallets/react-wallet-v2/src/utils/WalletPay.ts | Implements wallet pay processing logic |
| advanced/wallets/react-wallet-v2/src/utils/AuthUtil.ts | Adds authentication message preparation and signing utilities |
| advanced/wallets/react-wallet-v2/src/lib/EIP155Lib.ts | Implements ERC20 token transfer for wallet pay |
| advanced/dapps/walletconnect-pay-dapp/src/app/page.tsx | Creates POS terminal interface for payment processing |
| advanced/dapps/react-dapp-v2/src/contexts/ClientContext.tsx | Adds authentication request handling and verification |
| advanced/dapps/react-dapp-v2/src/components/Blockchain.tsx | Adds visual authentication indicators |
Files not reviewed (1)
- advanced/wallets/react-wallet-v2/pnpm-lock.yaml: Language not supported
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
| const { getAvailableSmartAccountsOnNamespaceChains } = useSmartAccounts() | ||
| const [walletPay, setWalletPay] = useState(proposal?.params?.requests?.walletPay) | ||
| const [processPayment, setProcessPayment] = useState(true) | ||
| console.log('proposal', JSON.stringify(proposal, null, 2)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Debug console.log statement should be removed from production code to avoid cluttering the console output.
| console.log('proposal', JSON.stringify(proposal, null, 2)) |
| export async function processWalletPay({ walletPay }: { walletPay: EngineTypes.WalletPayParams }) { | ||
| const chainId = parseChainId(walletPay.acceptedPayments[0].recipient) | ||
| const address = getAddress(`${chainId.namespace}:${chainId.reference}`) | ||
| const wallet = (await getWallet(address)) as EIP155Lib | ||
| return wallet.walletPay(walletPay) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function assumes acceptedPayments[0] exists without validation. Add a check to ensure acceptedPayments array is not empty before accessing the first element to prevent potential runtime errors.
| const tx = await token.transfer(recepientAddress, assetAmount, { | ||
| gasLimit: 100_000n // manually override | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Corrected spelling of 'recipientAddress' variable name."
| const tx = await token.transfer(recepientAddress, assetAmount, { | ||
| gasLimit: 100_000n // manually override |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hard-coded gas limit should be calculated dynamically or made configurable. A fixed value of 100,000 may be insufficient for complex token transfers or cause failures on congested networks.
| const tx = await token.transfer(recepientAddress, assetAmount, { | |
| gasLimit: 100_000n // manually override | |
| const estimatedGas = await token.estimateGas.transfer(recepientAddress, assetAmount); | |
| const gasLimit = estimatedGas + estimatedGas / 10n; // add 10% buffer | |
| const tx = await token.transfer(recepientAddress, assetAmount, { | |
| gasLimit |
| // @ts-expect-error - slight type mismatch due to new universal provider version | ||
| universalProvider: _up, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TypeScript error suppression should be addressed by fixing the underlying type mismatch rather than ignoring it. This creates technical debt and potential runtime issues.
| // @ts-expect-error - slight type mismatch due to new universal provider version | |
| universalProvider: _up, | |
| universalProvider: _up as InstanceType<typeof UniversalProvider>, |
1 participant
WalletConnect Pay based on https://eip.tools/caip/358