-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
Refactor TLS API #388
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
sagebind
wants to merge
15
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
tls-api-refactor
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Refactor TLS API #388
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9ea8ffb
Refactor TLS API
sagebind f4f7ffe
Root cert store API
sagebind 24572af
Merge branch 'master' into tls-api-refactor
sagebind d6a41b3
Move all of TLS into tls feature
sagebind 49cf68d
Improve native root store detection
sagebind 6472b52
Tweak rustls-native-certs conditional compilation
sagebind 6fc1066
Update and expand proxy support
sagebind 8df200e
Use released curl version
sagebind 34f158e
Make identity its own field
sagebind c559b94
Merge branch 'master' into tls-api-refactor
sagebind 8016ff5
Add default-tls feature to add a layer of indirection to the default …
sagebind 0cbced6
Add tls-insecure feature to guard dangerous config
sagebind 654f505
Split identity off of TLS config
sagebind 57d8775
Update CI
sagebind c39f6f8
Update CI
sagebind File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm thinking about adding
enable
alike API:Or add API like
accept_invalid_certs()
but under inside featureinsecure_tls
?