Skip to content

Conversation

lenghuang
Copy link
Collaborator

Restructured #17

@jacobneu
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe this PR could be coordinated with #29? I agree that natural number induction is an easier way to introduce induction than tree induction, but we should still keep the tree content. In #29 , I rename inductionintuition.md to treeinduct.md, and put the intro to induction/recursion in recind.md. It looks like some of your natural number induction content would fit nicely in the recind.md I'm writing.

Also, worth noting: currently, inductionintuition.md does not appear in SUMMARY.md, and therefore does not appear in the left sidebar (so it effectively hasn't been visible). This is fixed in #29, but should be addressed either way.

@lenghuang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jacobneu: Maybe this PR could be coordinated with #29? .... This is fixed in #29, but should be addressed either way.

Yea that sounds good to me. I'll put a pause on this for now then and start working on other SML Help things. I guess you can take the aspects that you think may fit well with #29, then based off what you take, I'll adjust the new treeinduct.md accordingly? Because right now at least, I'm not 100% how my tree induction content would be all that helpful beyond the initial "recursive thinking" aspect?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants