Ironic overcloud hypervisor deployment

[assumptionsandg]

Deployment playbook for baremetal instances to be used as hypervisors.

TODO: Documentation refactoring (separate everything prior to hypervisors?)

[Alex-Welsh]

@assumptionsandg remember to mark conversations as resolved when you've completed them! Makes it much easier for reviewers to know when to re-review.

Is this still a draft? Who do you need a review from to get it merged?

[assumptionsandg]

@assumptionsandg remember to mark conversations as resolved when you've completed them! Makes it much easier for reviewers to know when to re-review.

Is this still a draft? Who do you need a review from to get it merged?

It's still WIP on the client side of things, hence leaving it as a draft here. We could merge what's here now and interate/fix things as the client work progresses if what's here will be useful to people.

[Alex-Welsh]

@assumptionsandg remember to mark conversations as resolved when you've completed them! Makes it much easier for reviewers to know when to re-review.
Is this still a draft? Who do you need a review from to get it merged?

It's still WIP on the client side of things, hence leaving it as a draft here. We could merge what's here now and interate/fix things as the client work progresses if what's here will be useful to people.

I'd be happy with it as long as you add a big warning at the top saying the docs are still WIP. Something is better than nothing

[Alex-Welsh]

@assumptionsandg you need to tag people for re-review when you make changes. This has been sat around for two months and I don't think anyone has looked at it

[Alex-Welsh]

These are good docs. I've got a lot of comments but they're mostly just small formatting and grammar fixes.

[Alex-Welsh]

@assumptionsandg let me know when this is ready for a re-review

[Alex-Welsh]

@assumptionsandg ready for review?