Support abritrary epochs in TestChainstate

stacks-common/src/types/mod.rs

@@ -441,7 +441,14 @@ impl StacksEpochId {
         StacksEpochId::Epoch33
     }
 
-    pub const ALL_GTE_30: &'static [StacksEpochId] = &[
+    pub const ALL_GTE_20: &'static [StacksEpochId] = &[
+        StacksEpochId::Epoch20,
+        StacksEpochId::Epoch2_05,
+        StacksEpochId::Epoch21,
+        StacksEpochId::Epoch22,
+        StacksEpochId::Epoch23,
+        StacksEpochId::Epoch24,
+        StacksEpochId::Epoch25,
         StacksEpochId::Epoch30,
         StacksEpochId::Epoch31,
         StacksEpochId::Epoch32,

stackslib/src/chainstate/coordinator/mod.rs

@@ -1732,6 +1732,16 @@ impl<
         Ok(None)
     }
 
+    /// A helper function for exposing the private process_new_pox_anchor_test function
+    #[cfg(test)]
+    pub fn process_new_pox_anchor_test(
+        &mut self,
+        block_id: BlockHeaderHash,
+        already_processed_burn_blocks: &mut HashSet<BurnchainHeaderHash>,
+    ) -> Result<Option<BlockHeaderHash>, Error> {
+        self.process_new_pox_anchor(block_id, already_processed_burn_blocks)
+    }
+
     /// Process a new PoX anchor block, possibly resulting in the PoX history being unwound and
     /// replayed through a different sequence of consensus hashes.  If the new anchor block causes
     /// the node to reach a prepare-phase that elects a network-affirmed anchor block that we don't

stackslib/src/chainstate/nakamoto/coordinator/mod.rs

@@ -363,28 +363,27 @@ pub fn load_nakamoto_reward_set<U: RewardSetProvider>(
     provider: &U,
 ) -> Result<Option<(RewardCycleInfo, StacksHeaderInfo)>, Error> {
     let cycle_start_height = burnchain.nakamoto_first_block_of_cycle(reward_cycle);
-
     let epoch_at_height = SortitionDB::get_stacks_epoch(sort_db.conn(), cycle_start_height)?
-        .unwrap_or_else(|| {
-            panic!(
-                "FATAL: no epoch defined for burn height {}",
-                cycle_start_height
-            )
-        });
-
-    // Find the first Stacks block in this reward cycle's preceding prepare phase.
-    // This block will have invoked `.signers.stackerdb-set-signer-slots()` with the reward set.
-    // Note that we may not have processed it yet. But, if we do find it, then it's
-    // unique (and since Nakamoto Stacks blocks are processed in order, the anchor block
-    // cannot change later).
-    let first_epoch30_reward_cycle = burnchain
-        .block_height_to_reward_cycle(epoch_at_height.start_height)
-        .expect("FATAL: no reward cycle for epoch 3.0 start height");
-
-    if !epoch_at_height
-        .epoch_id
-        .uses_nakamoto_reward_set(reward_cycle, first_epoch30_reward_cycle)
-    {
+        .unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("FATAL: no epoch defined for burn height {cycle_start_height}"));
+    let is_pre_naka_epoch = if epoch_at_height.epoch_id < StacksEpochId::Epoch30 {
+        true
+    } else {
+        let epoch_30 =
+            SortitionDB::get_stacks_epoch_by_epoch_id(sort_db.conn(), &StacksEpochId::Epoch30)?
+                .unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("FATAL: no Nakamoto epoch defined"));
+        // Find the first Stacks block in this reward cycle's preceding prepare phase.
+        // This block will have invoked `.signers.stackerdb-set-signer-slots()` with the reward set.
+        // Note that we may not have processed it yet. But, if we do find it, then it's
+        // unique (and since Nakamoto Stacks blocks are processed in order, the anchor block
+        // cannot change later).
+        let first_epoch30_reward_cycle = burnchain
+            .block_height_to_reward_cycle(epoch_30.start_height)
+            .expect("FATAL: no reward cycle for epoch 3.0 start height");
+        !epoch_at_height
+            .epoch_id
+            .uses_nakamoto_reward_set(reward_cycle, first_epoch30_reward_cycle)
+    };
+    if is_pre_naka_epoch {
         // in epoch 2.5, and in the first reward cycle of epoch 3.0, the reward set can *only* be found in the sortition DB.
         // The nakamoto chain-processing rules aren't active yet, so we can't look for the reward
         // cycle info in the nakamoto chain state.

stackslib/src/chainstate/nakamoto/tests/node.rs

@@ -1062,6 +1062,75 @@ impl TestStacksNode {
         Ok((block, size, cost))
     }
 
+    /// Insert a staging pre-Nakamoto block and microblocks
+    /// then process them as the next ready block
+    /// NOTE: Will panic if called with unprocessed staging
+    /// blocks already in the queue.
+    pub fn process_pre_nakamoto_next_ready_block<'a>(
+        stacks_node: &mut TestStacksNode,
+        sortdb: &mut SortitionDB,
+        miner: &mut TestMiner,
+        tenure_id_consensus_hash: &ConsensusHash,
+        coord: &mut ChainsCoordinator<
+            'a,
+            TestEventObserver,
+            (),
+            OnChainRewardSetProvider<'a, TestEventObserver>,
+            (),
+            (),
+            BitcoinIndexer,
+        >,
+        block: &StacksBlock,
+        microblocks: &[StacksMicroblock],
+    ) -> Result<Option<StacksEpochReceipt>, ChainstateError> {
+        // First append the block to the staging blocks
+        {
+            let ic = sortdb.index_conn();
+            let tip = SortitionDB::get_canonical_burn_chain_tip(&ic).unwrap();
+            stacks_node
+                .chainstate
+                .preprocess_stacks_epoch(&ic, &tip, block, microblocks)
+                .unwrap();
+        }
+
+        let canonical_sortition_tip = coord.canonical_sortition_tip.clone().expect(
+            "FAIL: processing a new Stacks block, but don't have a canonical sortition tip",
+        );
+        let mut sort_tx = sortdb.tx_begin_at_tip();
+        let res = stacks_node
+            .chainstate
+            .process_next_staging_block(&mut sort_tx, coord.dispatcher)
+            .map(|(epoch_receipt, _)| epoch_receipt)?;
+        sort_tx.commit()?;
+        if let Some(block_receipt) = res.as_ref() {
+            let in_sortition_set = coord
+                .sortition_db
+                .is_stacks_block_in_sortition_set(
+                    &canonical_sortition_tip,
+                    &block_receipt.header.anchored_header.block_hash(),
+                )
+                .unwrap();
+            if in_sortition_set {
+                let block_hash = block_receipt.header.anchored_header.block_hash();
+                // Was this block sufficiently confirmed by the prepare phase that it was a PoX
+                // anchor block?  And if we're in epoch 2.1, does it match the heaviest-confirmed
+                // block-commit in the burnchain DB, and is it affirmed by the majority of the
+                // network?
+                if let Some(pox_anchor) = coord
+                    .sortition_db
+                    .is_stacks_block_pox_anchor(&block_hash, &canonical_sortition_tip)
+                    .unwrap()
+                {
+                    debug!("Discovered PoX anchor block {block_hash} off of canonical sortition tip {canonical_sortition_tip}");
+                    coord
+                        .process_new_pox_anchor_test(pox_anchor, &mut HashSet::new())
+                        .unwrap();
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        Ok(res)
+    }
+
     /// Insert a staging Nakamoto block as a pushed block and
     /// then process it as the next ready block
     /// NOTE: Will panic if called with unprocessed staging