BUG: to_csv should gracefully handle empty results#28
Merged
AlexCK-STFC merged 2 commits intomainfrom Sep 30, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #28 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 111 111
Lines 4103 4111 +8
=========================================
+ Hits 4103 4111 +8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
AlexCK-STFC
force-pushed
the
allow-empty-results-for-to-csv
branch
from
8fbd309 to
3ba5a72
Compare
jcornall
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2025
anish-mudaraddi
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Includes major bump
Can we merge #26 and #25 first to avoid minor bump merge conflict?