We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IMHO The join type should be left when the reference field is optional/nullable, for example:
[Reference(typeof(SCollection), ReferenceAttribute.JoinType.Left)] public SCollection? Collection { get; set; }
I'm pretty new to C# so I'm not sure if this is possible, I would say that you cannot do this with Java annotations.
If this is possible, I don't mind to learn how annotations work in C# and help with this change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Feature request
IMHO The join type should be left when the reference field is optional/nullable, for example:
Describe the solution you'd like
I'm pretty new to C# so I'm not sure if this is possible, I would say that you cannot do this with Java annotations.
If this is possible, I don't mind to learn how annotations work in C# and help with this change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: