Skip to content

Conversation

jackgdll
Copy link
Contributor

@jackgdll jackgdll commented Aug 12, 2025

Closes: #16086

Adds support for spreading function bindings using ... syntax.

Before:

<script>
  const [get, set] = bindLowerCase(value);
</script>
<input bind:value={get, set} />

After:

<script>
  function bindLowerCase(value) {
    return [
      () => value.toLowerCase(),
      (v) => value = v.toLowerCase()
    ];
  }
</script>
<input bind:value={...bindLowerCase(value)} />

Works with arrays [get, set] and objects {get, set}.
If either get or set is nullish it's a noop.
If either get or set is not a function a runtime error is thrown.

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

  • It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
  • Prefix your PR title with feat:, fix:, chore:, or docs:.
  • This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it solves.
  • Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.
  • If this PR changes code within packages/svelte/src, add a changeset (npx changeset).

Tests and linting

  • Run the tests with pnpm test and lint the project with pnpm lint

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Aug 12, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9c05042

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
svelte Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@svelte-docs-bot
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

Playground

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/svelte@16607

@jackgdll jackgdll marked this pull request as draft August 12, 2025 19:44
@jackgdll jackgdll marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2025 20:10
@Rich-Harris
Copy link
Member

Thank you! I think this would need to run inside an effect, or use a derived, since otherwise something like this...

<input bind:value={...binding(validation, defaults)} />

...wouldn't update if validation or defaults did. Or to take an example similar to the one above, toggling uppercase has no effect, and it feels like it probably ought to.

@jackgdll
Copy link
Contributor Author

jackgdll commented Sep 2, 2025

Thanks! I wrapped the call to $.validate_spread_bindings in a derived and added a test for this case

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow spreading function bindings
2 participants