Skip to content

Conversation

vedkops
Copy link
Contributor

@vedkops vedkops commented Oct 10, 2025

Description

Fixes #

  • Fixed Workflows

Closes #


Type of Change

  • Feature
  • Feature (Breaking Change)
  • Fix
  • Fix (Breaking Change)
  • CI/CD
  • Documentation
  • Other (please specify):

Checklist

  • I have reviewed open pull requests to avoid duplication of work
  • All relevant pipelines or checks pass successfully
  • I have added or updated documentation if applicable

@vedkops vedkops self-assigned this Oct 10, 2025
@vedkops vedkops requested a review from a team as a code owner October 10, 2025 19:04
@vedkops vedkops added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 10, 2025
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @vedkops, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request implements a crucial fix to the existing workflows by correcting an incorrect module source reference within the Terraform configuration. The change specifically updates the 'labels' module to point to the appropriate 'terraform-az-modules/labels/azure' source, resolving potential issues related to resource tagging and ensuring the infrastructure is provisioned with the intended labels.

Highlights

  • Terraform Module Source Correction: The source for the 'labels' module in 'main.tf' has been updated from 'terraform-az-modules/tags/azure' to 'terraform-az-modules/labels/azure' to ensure the correct module is being utilized for resource tagging.
Ignored Files
  • Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (4)
    • .github/workflows/auto_assignee.yml
    • .github/workflows/automerge.yml
    • .github/workflows/changelog.yml
    • .github/workflows/tag-release.yml
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses a fix in the main.tf file by updating the source of the labels Terraform module. The change from terraform-az-modules/tags/azure to terraform-az-modules/labels/azure is correct and aligns the module source with its intended function and local name, likely resolving the workflow issues mentioned. The change is concise and I have no further recommendations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant