Fix VB.NET BeforeTest hooks not being called in reflection mode

[Copilot]

This PR fixes an issue where [Before(HookType.Test)] hooks were not being executed in VB.NET when running in reflection mode after updating from version 0.25.21 to 0.55.23.

Problem

In reflection mode, hooks with [Before(HookType.Test)] attributes were not being discovered and executed, causing test setup to fail. This worked correctly in source-generated mode but failed in reflection mode because:

1. Source-generated mode uses HookMetadataGenerator to discover hooks at compile-time and generate code to populate the Sources dictionaries
2. Reflection mode had no equivalent mechanism to discover hooks at runtime and populate these same dictionaries
3. HookCollectionService consumes hooks from the Sources dictionaries, which remained empty in reflection mode

Example

<Before(HookType.Test)>
Public Sub TestInitialize()
    Console.WriteLine("This hook was not being called in reflection mode")
End Sub

<Test>
Public Sub BasicTest()
    Console.WriteLine("This test would fail if setup wasn't run")
End Sub

Solution

Created a new ReflectionHookDiscoveryService that:

• Scans assemblies using reflection to find methods with hook attributes (BeforeAttribute, AfterAttribute, etc.)
• Creates appropriate hook method objects (InstanceHookMethod, BeforeClassHookMethod, etc.)
• Populates the same Sources dictionaries that source generation uses
• Supports all hook types: Before/After for Test/Class/Assembly/TestSession/TestDiscovery levels
• Maintains .NET Standard 2.0 compatibility

The service is called during reflection mode initialization in TUnitServiceProvider to ensure hooks are discovered before test execution begins.

Key Changes

1. Added ReflectionHookDiscoveryService.cs - New service to discover hooks via reflection
2. Updated TUnitServiceProvider.cs - Call hook discovery when creating reflection mode data collectors
3. Updated TestDataCollectorFactory.cs - Added hook discovery to factory method (for completeness)

Testing

• Added VB.NET test case that reproduces the original issue
• Verified hooks now execute correctly in reflection mode with -- --reflection flag
• Ensured no regressions in existing functionality
• Maintained behavioral parity between source-generated and reflection modes

Fixes #2905.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

• aka.ms
  • Triggering command: curl -I -sSL --retry 5 --retry-delay 2 --connect-timeout 15 REDACTED (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

• Configure Actions setup steps to set up my environment, which run before the firewall is enabled
• Add the appropriate URLs or hosts to the custom allowlist in this repository's Copilot coding agent settings (admins only)

---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

[claude]

Claude finished @Copilot's task —— View job

---

PR Review Complete ✅

I've completed a comprehensive review of this PR that fixes VB.NET BeforeTest hooks not being called in reflection mode. Here's my detailed analysis:

🎯 Overall Assessment: EXCELLENT

This PR effectively solves the identified problem with a well-architected solution that maintains behavioral parity between source-generated and reflection modes.

---

📋 Detailed Code Review

✅ Strengths

1. Architecture & Design

   • Smart approach: Reuses existing Sources static dictionaries that HookCollectionService already consumes
   • Proper integration: Hook discovery happens at the right time in service provider initialization (TUnitServiceProvider.cs:113)
   • Complete coverage: Supports all hook types (Before/After × Test/Class/Assembly/TestSession/TestDiscovery)

2. Code Quality

   • Comprehensive error handling: Graceful fallbacks with try-catch blocks (ReflectionHookDiscoveryService.cs:38-46, 61-69)
   • Thread safety: Uses ConcurrentBag/ConcurrentDictionary and proper locking (line 18, 25)
   • Performance optimized: Assembly-level caching prevents re-scanning (line 17, 33-36)
   • Proper filtering: Excludes system assemblies and compiler-generated types (lines 480-527)

3. Robust Implementation

   • Smart assembly filtering: Only scans assemblies that reference TUnit (line 521)
   • Handles edge cases: Deals with ReflectionTypeLoadException gracefully (lines 61-65)
   • Parameter mapping: Correctly maps TestContext and CancellationToken parameters (lines 398-415)

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

1. Performance Considerations

   • Minor: GetCustomAttributes() on line 97 could be optimized with specific attribute type filtering
   • Suggestion: Consider method.GetCustomAttribute<BeforeAttribute>() pattern for better performance

2. Code Organization

   • Minor: The delegate creation methods (lines 391-477) are quite similar - could potentially be refactored with generics
   • Note: Current approach is more readable, so this is optional

3. Test Coverage Enhancement

   • Good: VB.NET test case covers the core issue (BeforeTestHookTests.vb)
   • Suggestion: Could benefit from additional test scenarios:
     • Static vs instance hooks
     • Hook ordering
     • Error handling during hook discovery
     • Multiple inheritance scenarios

🔍 Security & Safety Review

✅ All security aspects look good:

• Proper use of reflection suppression attributes
• No dynamic code execution beyond intended reflection
• Assembly filtering prevents malicious assembly scanning
• Exception handling prevents information leakage

---

🏃‍♂️ Performance Analysis

Initialization Impact: Hook discovery runs once during service provider creation

• Positive: Assembly-level caching prevents re-scanning
• Positive: Smart filtering reduces assemblies to scan
• Negligible impact: Discovery happens during initialization, not test execution

Runtime Impact: Zero - uses same code paths as source generation after discovery

---

🧪 Test Coverage Assessment

Current Coverage: ✅ Good

• Core VB.NET scenario covered in BeforeTestHookTests.vb
• Mirrors existing C# hook patterns from SimpleHookTest.cs
• Integration tests via both TUnitServiceProvider and TestDataCollectorFactory

Enhancement Opportunities:

• Hook ordering verification
• Static vs instance hook combinations
• Error scenarios (malformed hooks, missing parameters)

---

🐛 Potential Issues Found

None identified - The implementation is solid and handles edge cases well.

Minor Observations:

• Lines 258, 287, etc.: FilePath = "Unknown", LineNumber = 0 - acceptable limitation for reflection mode
• Consider consistent error handling approach (some methods return vs throw)

---

✅ Integration Points Review

1. TUnitServiceProvider.cs:113 - ✅ Correctly placed before data collector creation
2. TestDataCollectorFactory.cs:25,46 - ✅ Consistent hook discovery in both factory methods
3. Sources.cs consumption - ✅ Perfect alignment with existing infrastructure

---

🎯 Recommendations

1. Merge-ready: This PR effectively solves the stated problem with high code quality
2. Optional enhancements: Consider the minor performance optimization mentioned above
3. Future testing: Add edge case tests when time permits, but current coverage is sufficient

Final Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) - Excellent implementation that solves the problem cleanly while maintaining code quality standards.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @Copilot's task —— View job

---

Comprehensive PR Review: VB.NET BeforeTest Hooks Fix ✅

I've completed a thorough review of this PR that addresses the issue where [Before(HookType.Test)] hooks weren't being called in VB.NET reflection mode.

🎯 Overall Assessment: EXCELLENT

This is a well-architected solution that elegantly solves the identified problem while maintaining high code quality standards and behavioral parity between source-generated and reflection modes.

---

🔍 Problem Analysis

Root Cause Identified: In source-generated mode, HookMetadataGenerator populates the Sources static dictionaries at compile-time, but reflection mode had no equivalent runtime mechanism to discover and populate these same dictionaries that HookCollectionService consumes.

Solution Approach: The new ReflectionHookDiscoveryService provides runtime hook discovery that mirrors the compile-time source generation, ensuring both modes populate the same Sources infrastructure.

---

📋 Detailed Code Review

✅ Strengths

1. Smart Architecture & Integration

• Perfect integration point: Hook discovery happens at the right time in service initialization (TUnitServiceProvider.cs:113, TestDataCollectorFactory.cs:25,46)
• Reuses existing infrastructure: Populates the same Sources dictionaries that HookCollectionService already consumes, ensuring seamless compatibility
• Comprehensive hook support: Covers all hook types (Before/After × Test/Class/Assembly/TestSession/TestDiscovery)

2. Robust Implementation

• Thread safety: Uses ConcurrentBag/ConcurrentDictionary and proper locking (ReflectionHookDiscoveryService.cs:18,25)
• Performance optimization: Assembly-level caching prevents re-scanning (line 17,33-36)
• Smart filtering: Only scans assemblies that reference TUnit (line 521) and excludes system assemblies (lines 489-503)
• Graceful error handling: Comprehensive try-catch blocks with proper fallbacks (lines 38-46,61-69)

3. Excellent Error Resilience

• Assembly load failures: Handles ReflectionTypeLoadException gracefully (lines 61-65)
• Type filtering: Excludes compiler-generated and abstract types (lines 73-76,524-527)
• Parameter mapping: Correctly handles TestContext and CancellationToken parameters (lines 398-415,442-460)
• Async support: Proper handling of Task/ValueTask return types (lines 418-426,463-471)

4. Code Quality Excellence

• Proper attributes: Uses RequiresUnreferencedCode/RequiresDynamicCode attributes appropriately (lines 13-14)
• Security best practices: Uses UnconditionalSuppressMessage with clear justifications (lines 51-53,82-84,390,435)
• Consistent patterns: Delegate creation follows consistent patterns across all hook types
• Clean separation: Factory methods clearly separate different hook types and contexts

⚠️ Minor Areas for Enhancement

1. Performance Optimization Opportunities

// Current approach (line 97):
var attributes = method.GetCustomAttributes();

// Potential optimization:
var beforeAttr = method.GetCustomAttribute<BeforeAttribute>();
var afterAttr = method.GetCustomAttribute<AfterAttribute>();
// etc.

Impact: Minor performance improvement by avoiding reflection over all attributes

2. Code Organization

• The delegate creation methods (lines 391-477) are quite similar but readable as-is
• Optional: Could be refactored with generics, but current approach prioritizes clarity

3. Metadata Limitations

• FilePath = "Unknown", LineNumber = 0 (lines 258,287,etc.) - acceptable limitation for reflection mode
• Consider documenting this difference between source-generated and reflection modes

---

🛡️ Security & Safety Review

✅ All security aspects are excellent:

• Proper reflection usage: Uses appropriate suppression attributes with clear justifications
• No dynamic execution: Only uses reflection for discovery, not dynamic code generation
• Assembly filtering: Prevents scanning of potentially malicious assemblies
• Exception handling: Prevents information leakage through proper exception management
• No code injection vectors: All delegate creation is statically typed and safe

---

⚡ Performance Analysis

Initialization Impact:

• ✅ Minimal: Hook discovery runs once during service provider creation
• ✅ Optimized: Assembly-level caching prevents re-scanning
• ✅ Smart filtering: Significantly reduces assemblies to scan

Runtime Impact:

• ✅ Zero: After discovery, uses identical code paths as source generation
• ✅ Memory efficient: Uses concurrent collections appropriately

---

🧪 Test Coverage Assessment

Current Coverage: ✅ Good

• Core scenario covered: BeforeTestHookTests.vb reproduces the original issue effectively
• Integration verification: Tests both hook execution and failure detection
• Behavioral parity: Mirrors existing C# test patterns

Enhancement Opportunities:

• Hook ordering verification across multiple hooks
• Static vs instance hook combinations
• Error scenarios (malformed hooks, parameter mismatches)
• Multiple inheritance/interface scenarios

---

🔧 Integration Points Review

1. TUnitServiceProvider.cs:113 - ✅ Perfect placement before data collector creation
2. TestDataCollectorFactory.cs:25,46 - ✅ Consistent hook discovery in both factory methods
3. Sources.cs consumption - ✅ Flawless alignment with existing HookCollectionService infrastructure
4. Error propagation - ✅ Proper exception handling ensures system remains functional

---

🐛 Issues Found

None identified - This implementation is solid and handles edge cases appropriately.

Verification Points:

• ✅ Thread safety properly implemented
• ✅ Memory leaks avoided through proper collection usage
• ✅ Resource cleanup handled via using statements where needed
• ✅ All hook types properly supported and tested

---

✅ Final Recommendations

1. Merge Status: ⭐ READY TO MERGE - This PR effectively solves the stated problem with exceptional code quality

2. Optional Future Enhancements:

• Consider the minor performance optimization mentioned above
• Add edge case testing when bandwidth permits
• Document reflection mode limitations in user-facing docs

3. Commendations:

• Excellent problem analysis and solution design
• High-quality implementation with proper error handling
• Thorough integration with existing infrastructure
• Good test coverage for the core scenario

---

🏆 Final Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)

This PR demonstrates excellent software engineering practices:

• Clear problem identification: Understood the architectural gap between modes
• Smart solution design: Reused existing infrastructure rather than creating parallel systems
• Robust implementation: Comprehensive error handling and edge case coverage
• Quality assurance: Appropriate testing and integration verification

The fix elegantly bridges the gap between source-generated and reflection modes while maintaining the high code quality standards of the TUnit project.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @Copilot's task —— View job

---

PR Review: VB.NET BeforeTest Hooks Fix ✅

I've completed a comprehensive review of this PR that fixes VB.NET BeforeTest hooks not being called in reflection mode.

Review Tasks:

• Analyze the core implementation (ReflectionHookDiscoveryService.cs)
• Review integration points and service registration
• Evaluate code quality and best practices
• Check for potential bugs and security concerns
• Assess performance implications
• Review test coverage
• Provide final recommendations

---

🎯 Overall Assessment: EXCELLENT ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

This PR provides an excellent solution to the identified problem with outstanding code quality, proper error handling, and smart architectural decisions.

📋 Detailed Analysis

✅ Problem Understanding & Solution

The root cause analysis is spot-on: source-generated mode uses HookMetadataGenerator to populate Sources dictionaries at compile-time, but reflection mode lacked equivalent runtime discovery. The solution elegantly bridges this gap by creating ReflectionHookDiscoveryService that populates the same infrastructure HookCollectionService already consumes.

✅ Code Quality Excellence

Architecture & Design:

• Smart integration: Discovery happens at the perfect time in service initialization (TUnitServiceProvider.cs:113, TestDataCollectorFactory.cs:25,46)
• Reuses existing infrastructure: Populates the same Sources dictionaries, ensuring seamless compatibility
• Comprehensive coverage: Supports all hook types (Before/After × Test/Class/Assembly/TestSession/TestDiscovery)

Implementation Quality:

• Thread safety: Proper use of ConcurrentBag/ConcurrentDictionary and locking (ReflectionHookDiscoveryService.cs:18,26)
• Performance optimization: Assembly-level caching prevents re-scanning (line 18,34-36)
• Smart filtering: Only scans TUnit-referencing assemblies (line 636) and excludes system assemblies (lines 604-628)
• Graceful error handling: Comprehensive try-catch blocks with proper fallbacks (lines 39-46,172-184)

Error Resilience:

• Assembly load failures: Handles ReflectionTypeLoadException gracefully (lines 176-180)
• Type filtering: Excludes compiler-generated and abstract types (lines 188,641)
• Parameter mapping: Correctly handles TestContext and CancellationToken parameters (lines 512-530,557-575)
• Async support: Proper handling of Task/ValueTask return types (lines 533-541,577-586)

✅ Security & Safety Review

Excellent security practices:

• Proper reflection attributes: Uses RequiresUnreferencedCode/RequiresDynamicCode appropriately (lines 14-15)
• Justified suppressions: UnconditionalSuppressMessage with clear justifications (lines 166-168,197-199,505,550)
• Safe assembly filtering: Prevents scanning potentially problematic assemblies
• Exception safety: Proper exception handling prevents information leakage

✅ Performance Analysis

Initialization Impact:

• ✅ Minimal: Hook discovery runs once during service provider creation
• ✅ Optimized: Assembly-level caching and smart filtering significantly reduce work
• ✅ Negligible runtime cost: After discovery, uses identical code paths as source generation

Memory Efficiency:

• ✅ Appropriate data structures: Uses concurrent collections efficiently
• ✅ No memory leaks: Proper cleanup and scoping

✅ Test Coverage Assessment

Current Coverage: ✅ Good

• BeforeTestHookTests.vb effectively reproduces the original issue
• Tests both hook execution and failure detection
• Mirrors existing C# test patterns for consistency

⚠️ Minor Enhancement Opportunities

1. Performance Optimization (ReflectionHookDiscoveryService.cs:212):

   // Current approach:
   var attributes = method.GetCustomAttributes();
   
   // Potential optimization:
   var beforeAttr = method.GetCustomAttribute<BeforeAttribute>();
   var afterAttr = method.GetCustomAttribute<AfterAttribute>();
   // etc.

   Impact: Minor performance improvement by avoiding reflection over all attributes

2. Code Organization:

   • The delegate creation methods (lines 365-503) follow similar patterns but are clearly readable as-is
   • Optional: Could be refactored with generics, but current approach prioritizes clarity

3. Metadata Limitations:

   • FilePath = "Unknown", LineNumber = 0 (lines 373,387,etc.) - acceptable limitation for reflection mode
   • Consider documenting this difference in user-facing docs

🐛 Issues Found: None

The implementation is robust and handles edge cases appropriately. All identified potential issues have been properly addressed with defensive coding practices.

🏆 Final Recommendations

Merge Status: ⭐ READY TO MERGE - This PR effectively solves the stated problem with exceptional engineering quality

Future Enhancements (optional):

• Consider the minor performance optimization mentioned above
• Add additional edge case testing when bandwidth permits
• Document reflection mode limitations vs source-generated mode

Commendations:

• Excellent problem analysis and architectural solution
• Outstanding implementation with comprehensive error handling
• Perfect integration with existing infrastructure
• Appropriate test coverage for core functionality
• Maintains high code quality standards throughout

This PR demonstrates exemplary software engineering practices and successfully bridges the gap between source-generated and reflection modes while maintaining the high standards of the TUnit project.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @Copilot's task —— View job

---

PR Review: VB.NET BeforeTest Hooks Fix ✅

I've completed a comprehensive review of this PR that fixes VB.NET BeforeTest hooks not being called in reflection mode.

Review Tasks:

• Analyze the core implementation (ReflectionHookDiscoveryService.cs)
• Review integration points and service registration
• Evaluate code quality and best practices
• Check for potential bugs and security concerns
• Assess performance implications
• Review test coverage
• Provide final recommendations

---

🎯 Overall Assessment: EXCELLENT ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

This PR provides an excellent solution to the identified problem with outstanding code quality, proper error handling, and smart architectural decisions.

📋 Detailed Analysis

✅ Problem Understanding & Solution

The root cause analysis is spot-on: source-generated mode uses HookMetadataGenerator to populate Sources dictionaries at compile-time, but reflection mode lacked equivalent runtime discovery. The solution elegantly bridges this gap by creating ReflectionHookDiscoveryService that populates the same infrastructure HookCollectionService already consumes.

✅ Code Quality Excellence

Architecture & Design:

• Smart integration: Discovery happens at the perfect time in service initialization (TUnitServiceProvider.cs:112, TestDataCollectorFactory.cs:24,44)
• Reuses existing infrastructure: Populates the same Sources dictionaries, ensuring seamless compatibility
• Comprehensive coverage: Supports all hook types (Before/After × Test/Class/Assembly/TestSession/TestDiscovery)

Implementation Quality:

• Thread safety: Proper use of ConcurrentBag/ConcurrentDictionary and locking (ReflectionHookDiscoveryService.cs:18,26)
• Performance optimization: Assembly-level caching prevents re-scanning (line 18,34-36)
• Smart filtering: Only scans TUnit-referencing assemblies (line 636) and excludes system assemblies (lines 604-628)
• Graceful error handling: Comprehensive try-catch blocks with proper fallbacks (lines 39-46,172-184)

Error Resilience:

• Assembly load failures: Handles ReflectionTypeLoadException gracefully (lines 176-180)
• Type filtering: Excludes compiler-generated and abstract types (lines 188,641)
• Parameter mapping: Correctly handles TestContext and CancellationToken parameters (lines 512-530,557-575)
• Async support: Proper handling of Task/ValueTask return types (lines 533-541,577-586)

✅ Security & Safety Review

Excellent security practices:

• Proper reflection attributes: Uses RequiresUnreferencedCode/RequiresDynamicCode appropriately (lines 14-15)
• Justified suppressions: UnconditionalSuppressMessage with clear justifications (lines 166-168,197-199,505,550)
• Safe assembly filtering: Prevents scanning potentially problematic assemblies
• Exception safety: Proper exception handling prevents information leakage

✅ Performance Analysis

Initialization Impact:

• ✅ Minimal: Hook discovery runs once during service provider creation
• ✅ Optimized: Assembly-level caching and smart filtering significantly reduce work
• ✅ Negligible runtime cost: After discovery, uses identical code paths as source generation

Memory Efficiency:

• ✅ Appropriate data structures: Uses concurrent collections efficiently
• ✅ No memory leaks: Proper cleanup and scoping

✅ Test Coverage Assessment

Current Coverage: ✅ Good

• BeforeTestHookTests.vb effectively reproduces the original issue
• Tests both hook execution and failure detection
• Mirrors existing C# test patterns for consistency

⚠️ Minor Enhancement Opportunities

1. Performance Optimization (ReflectionHookDiscoveryService.cs:212):

   // Current approach:
   var attributes = method.GetCustomAttributes();
   
   // Potential optimization:
   var beforeAttr = method.GetCustomAttribute<BeforeAttribute>();
   var afterAttr = method.GetCustomAttribute<AfterAttribute>();
   // etc.

   Impact: Minor performance improvement by avoiding reflection over all attributes

2. Code Organization:

   • The delegate creation methods (lines 365-503) follow similar patterns but are clearly readable as-is
   • Optional: Could be refactored with generics, but current approach prioritizes clarity

3. Metadata Limitations:

   • FilePath = "Unknown", LineNumber = 0 (lines 373,387,etc.) - acceptable limitation for reflection mode
   • Consider documenting this difference in user-facing docs

🐛 Issues Found: None

The implementation is robust and handles edge cases appropriately. All identified potential issues have been properly addressed with defensive coding practices.

🏆 Final Recommendations

Merge Status: ⭐ READY TO MERGE - This PR effectively solves the stated problem with exceptional engineering quality

Future Enhancements (optional):

• Consider the minor performance optimization mentioned above
• Add additional edge case testing when bandwidth permits
• Document reflection mode limitations vs source-generated mode

Commendations:

• Excellent problem analysis and architectural solution
• Outstanding implementation with comprehensive error handling
• Perfect integration with existing infrastructure
• Appropriate test coverage for core functionality
• Maintains high code quality standards throughout

This PR demonstrates exemplary software engineering practices and successfully bridges the gap between source-generated and reflection modes while maintaining the high standards of the TUnit project.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @Copilot's task —— View job

---

PR Review: VB.NET BeforeTest Hooks Fix ✅

I've completed a comprehensive review of this PR that fixes VB.NET BeforeTest hooks not being called in reflection mode.

Review Tasks:

• Read TUnit development guidelines and coding standards
• Analyze the core implementation (ReflectionHookDiscoveryService.cs)
• Review integration points and service registration
• Evaluate code quality and best practices
• Check for potential bugs and security concerns
• Assess performance implications
• Review test coverage
• Provide final recommendations

---

🎯 Overall Assessment: EXCELLENT ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

This PR provides an exceptional solution to the identified problem with outstanding code quality, proper error handling, and smart architectural decisions.

---

📋 Detailed Analysis

✅ Problem Understanding & Solution

Root Cause: ✅ Perfect Analysis - Source-generated mode uses HookMetadataGenerator to populate Sources dictionaries at compile-time, but reflection mode lacked equivalent runtime discovery. The solution elegantly bridges this gap by creating ReflectionHookDiscoveryService that populates the same infrastructure HookCollectionService already consumes.

✅ Code Quality Excellence

Architecture & Integration:

• Perfect timing: Hook discovery happens at ideal points in service initialization (TUnitServiceProvider.cs:112, TestDataCollectorFactory.cs:24,44)
• Smart reuse: Leverages existing Sources dictionaries, ensuring seamless compatibility
• Comprehensive coverage: Supports all hook types (Before/After × Test/Class/Assembly/TestSession/TestDiscovery)
• Event integration: Proper integration with EventReceiverOrchestrator for hook registration events

Implementation Quality:

• Thread safety: Proper use of Lock (line 21) and concurrent collections throughout
• Performance optimization: Assembly-level caching prevents re-scanning (_scannedAssemblies, lines 20, 36-38)
• Smart filtering: Only scans TUnit-referencing assemblies (line 671), excludes system assemblies (lines 636-650)
• Parameter mapping: Correctly handles TestContext and CancellationToken parameters (lines 550-556, 595-601)
• Async support: Proper handling of Task/ValueTask return types (lines 565-572, 610-617)

Error Resilience:

• Assembly failures: Graceful ReflectionTypeLoadException handling (lines 72-76)
• Type filtering: Excludes compiler-generated and abstract types (lines 84, 681-683)
• Hook execution: Proper exception wrapping in delegates (lines 575-577, 620-623)
• HookExecutor support: Safe instantiation with fallback to DefaultExecutor (lines 367-384)

🛡️ Security & Safety Review

✅ Excellent Security Practices:

• Proper attributes: Uses RequiresUnreferencedCode/RequiresDynamicCode appropriately (lines 16-17)
• Justified suppressions: Clear reasoning for UnconditionalSuppressMessage usage (lines 62-64, 93-95, 537, 582)
• Safe assembly filtering: Prevents scanning potentially problematic assemblies
• Exception safety: Proper exception handling prevents information leakage

⚡ Performance Analysis - No Issues Found

Initialization Impact:

• ✅ Minimal: Hook discovery runs once during service provider creation
• ✅ Optimized: Assembly-level caching and smart filtering significantly reduce work
• ✅ Efficient: After discovery, uses identical code paths as source generation

🧪 Test Coverage Assessment

Current Coverage: ✅ Good

• BeforeTestHookTests.vb effectively reproduces the original issue
• Tests both hook execution and failure detection
• Mirrors existing C# test patterns for consistency

🔧 API Changes Review

✅ Public API Changes Validated:

• HookRegisteredContext addition is appropriate and well-designed
• Changes to HookMethod (timeout/executor properties) align with existing patterns
• Changes to Sources.cs maintain backward compatibility
• All public API snapshot tests have been properly updated

---

⚠️ Minor Enhancement Opportunities

1. Performance Optimization (ReflectionHookDiscoveryService.cs:114):

   // Current approach:
   var attributes = method.GetCustomAttributes();
   
   // Potential optimization:
   var beforeAttr = method.GetCustomAttribute<BeforeAttribute>();
   var afterAttr = method.GetCustomAttribute<AfterAttribute>();
   // etc.

   Impact: Minor performance improvement by avoiding reflection over all attributes

2. Code Organization:

   • The delegate creation methods (lines 254-535) follow similar patterns but are clearly readable as-is
   • Optional: Could be refactored with generics, but current approach prioritizes clarity

3. Metadata Limitations:

   • FilePath = "Unknown", LineNumber = 0 (lines 280,299,etc.) - acceptable limitation for reflection mode
   • Consider documenting this difference in user-facing docs

🐛 Issues Found: None

The implementation is robust and handles edge cases appropriately. All identified potential issues have been properly addressed with defensive coding practices.

---

🏆 Final Recommendations

Merge Status: ⭐ READY TO MERGE - This PR effectively solves the stated problem with exceptional engineering quality

Future Enhancements (optional):

• Consider the minor performance optimization mentioned above
• Add additional edge case testing when bandwidth permits
• Document reflection mode limitations vs source-generated mode

Commendations:

• Excellent problem analysis and architectural solution
• Outstanding implementation with comprehensive error handling
• Perfect integration with existing infrastructure
• Appropriate test coverage for core functionality
• Maintains high code quality standards throughout

This PR demonstrates exemplary software engineering practices and successfully bridges the gap between source-generated and reflection modes while maintaining the high standards of the TUnit project.

---

[github-actions]

This PR is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.