-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
feat: enhance parameter handling in test sources and add new tests for params keyword usage #3292
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…r params keyword usage
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job PR Review: Parameter Handling EnhancementReviewing this PR for code quality, potential bugs, performance considerations, security concerns, and test coverage. Todo List:
Review SummaryThis PR successfully addresses issue #2589 by enhancing parameter handling for ✅ Strengths1. Comprehensive C# Params Semantics Implementation
2. Dual-Mode Consistency
3. Excellent Test Coverage
4. Performance Optimizations
🔍 Code Quality Observations1. Source Generator Logic ( // Excellent C# params semantics implementation
var checkAndCast = $"({singleArg} is null ? null : {singleArg} is {paramsParam.Type.GloballyQualified()} arr ? arr : new {elementType.GloballyQualified()}[] {{ TUnit.Core.Helpers.CastHelper.Cast<{elementType.GloballyQualified()}>({singleArg}) }})"; This correctly handles the three cases: null, existing array, and single element wrapping. 2. Reflection Mode Logic ( 🔧 Minor Suggestions1. Code Documentation 2. Error Handling Enhancement 🚀 Performance Assessment
🔒 Security Review
📊 Test Coverage AnalysisExcellent coverage including:
🎯 Architectural Compliance✅ Follows TUnit Principles:
📋 Final AssessmentThis is a high-quality implementation that correctly addresses the issue while maintaining TUnit's architectural principles. The code demonstrates deep understanding of C# params semantics and implements them correctly in both execution modes. Recommended Action: ✅ Approve The implementation is robust, well-tested, and maintains backward compatibility while adding the requested functionality. |
Fixes #2589