-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
breaking: remove CLI verbosity
switch and re-use existing MTP output
switch
#3294
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job Pull Request ReviewReviewing PR #3294: breaking: remove CLI Review Tasks:
Review Feedback🎯 Overall Assessment: EXCELLENTThis is a well-executed refactoring that consolidates verbosity control by leveraging Microsoft.Testing.Platform's built-in ✅ Strengths1. Code Quality & Best Practices
2. Performance Considerations
3. User Experience Improvements
🔧 Technical AnalysisVerbosityService.cs Changes ( private static bool GetOutputLevel(ICommandLineOptions commandLineOptions, IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
// Check for --output flag (Microsoft.Testing.Platform extension)
if (commandLineOptions.TryGetOptionArgumentList("output", out var args) && args.Length > 0)
{
return args[0].Equals("Detailed", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
}
// Smart defaults: Normal for console (buffered output), Detailed for IDE (real-time output)
return !IsConsoleEnvironment(serviceProvider);
} This is excellent - the logic is clear and the defaults make sense for different environments. Documentation Updates ( 🚨 Areas for Consideration1. Breaking Change Communication
2. Test Coverage
3. Edge Cases
🔒 Security Assessment
🧪 Test Coverage RecommendationsHigh Priority:
Medium Priority:
📋 Action ItemsBefore Merge:
Post-Merge:
🎉 Final Recommendation: APPROVEThis PR successfully achieves its goal of consolidating verbosity control while improving the user experience. The implementation is clean, follows project conventions, and maintains backwards compatibility where possible. The main concern is the lack of test coverage for the new logic, but the code quality is high and the change is well-documented. Risk Level: Low (internal refactoring with good fallbacks) |
Fixes #2457