MdeModulePkg/AcpiTableDxe:Fixed memory corruption issue

[GeorgeLiao012]

Description

1. Fixed memory corruption issue in the InstallAcpiTableFromAcpiSiliconHob().
2. Added "PCD switch to avoid using ACPI reclaim memory" support in the InstallAcpiTableFromAcpiSiliconHob().
3. Added "PublishTables()" and "SdtNotifyAcpiList()" for completing AddTableToList behavior in the InstallAcpiTableFromAcpiSiliconHob().
4. Improving InitializeAcpiTableDxe() behavior.

• Breaking change?
  • Breaking change - Does this PR cause a break in build or boot behavior?
  • Examples: Does it add a new library class or move a module to a different repo.
• Impacts security?
  • Security - Does this PR have a direct security impact?
  • Examples: Crypto algorithm change or buffer overflow fix.
• Includes tests?
  • Tests - Does this PR include any explicit test code?
  • Examples: Unit tests or integration tests.

How This Was Tested

SUT booting to the operation system with ACPI tables that installed in the ACPI Hob

Integration Instructions

None

[tianocore-pr-automation]

Pull Request Formatting Issues

⚠️ Remove the following template lines from your PR description:
<_Include a description of the change and why this change was made._>
<_For each item, place an "x" in between [and]if true. Example:[x] (you can also check items in GitHub UI)_>
<_Create the PR as a Draft PR if it is only created to run CI checks._>
<_Delete lines in \<\> tags before creating the PR._>
<_Describe the test(s) that were run to verify the changes._>
<_Describe how these changes should be integrated. Use N/A if nothing is required._>

Address these issues and the validation will automatically re-run when you update your pull request.

[GeorgeLiao012]

@ankit13s @mdkinney Could you help to review this PR? Thanks.

[tianocore-pr-automation]

Pull Request Formatting Issues

⚠️ Remove the following template lines from your PR description:
<_Describe the test(s) that were run to verify the changes._>
<_Describe how these changes should be integrated. Use N/A if nothing is required._>

Address these issues and the validation will automatically re-run when you update your pull request.

[GeorgeLiao012]

@dandanbi @LiuZhiguang001 Could you help to review this PR? Thanks.

[GeorgeLiao012]

@lgao4 I got approval from Ankit, could you help to review it? If it is OK to you, pleas merge it.
Thank you very much.

[lgao4]

@lgao4 I got approval from Ankit, could you help to review it? If it is OK to you, pleas merge it. Thank you very much.

I am OK for the code change. I suggest to separate the changes to three commits. They resolve the different problems.

[GeorgeLiao012]

@lgao4 I got approval from Ankit, could you help to review it? If it is OK to you, pleas merge it. Thank you very much.

I am OK for the code change. I suggest to separate the changes to three commits. They resolve the different problems.

I broke the PR into the three commits and all checks have passed.
Please help to review the PR again, thank you very much.