-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Usemodels+glmnet: why a classification is suggested to predict a numerical variable? #45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I would like to add that this happens also with the (much simpler)
Unlike what shown in the example here |
Any reaction on this? It actually affects every model in the package. |
Please @larry77, give a .csv as input instead. I can't reproduce your example (I use 0.2.0.9000 version)
|
Hi! https://usemodels.tidymodels.org/index.html
Apparently there is a bug in the cran package which has been fixed in the development version. It would have been nice to have a word from the developers during the > 6 months since I opened this issue. |
Please look at the reprex at the end of this issue.
You can download the input data from
https://e.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=XZWXInZ683FG2Squ0bLeLRNaGnzxukG1Le7
(nothing dangerous).
I try to set up tidymodels + glmnet to predict a continuous, numerical variable ("close"), so why does usemodels give me a boilerplate for a classification model?
Created on 2024-03-06 with reprex v2.1.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: