Skip to content

Commit 78e7f2a

Browse files
committed
Outline is in the toc now
Signed-off-by: Cornelius Schumacher <cornelius.schumacher@deutschebahn.com>
1 parent 5661514 commit 78e7f2a

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-13
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-13
lines changed

whitepapers/business-value/README.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 13 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6,14 +6,13 @@
66
>
77
> Follow-up happening during Thursday TODO Europe Touchpoint CallS
88
9-
109
### Motivation
10+
1111
While the engineering-driven approach to open source is well-covered,a business-driven approach is less discussed but crucial for organizations to understand how open source can drive both innovation and financial value.
1212
This initiative was initiated as part of the TODO Group’s Touchpoint calls to create a guide to address the gap in knowledge and strategic guidance around open source adoption from a business-driven perspective.
1313

1414
<img width="858" alt="image4" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ad063fa7-ad6f-4d64-a1b8-ce4f39c13b8e">
1515

16-
1716
Full proposal can be found [here](https://github.com/todogroup/ospology/discussions/481).
1817
Apporved proposal and rationale can be found [here](https://github.com/todogroup/governance/blob/main/resolutions/approved/2024-08-05.md)
1918

@@ -23,19 +22,8 @@ Apporved proposal and rationale can be found [here](https://github.com/todogroup
2322
2. Help non-software-native companies (e.g., hardware or manufacturing) understand how open source can play a role in their business models.
2423
3. Educate business managers on the long-term investments required for successful open source strategies (e.g., building and nurturing open source communities).
2524

26-
## Initial Outline
27-
28-
[Glossary and Background - Existing frameworks and models](glossary.md) | [Engineering Driven vs. Business Driven Open Source](engineering-vs-business-driven.md) | [Misconceptions and Challenges](misconceptions_challenges.md) | [Communicating Engineering Benefits to Business Value](communication_of_benefits_to_business_value.md) | [Case Studies and Success Stories](case_studies_and_stories.md) | [Future work and conclusion](living_guide_for_business.md)
29-
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
30-
Guide's purpose and audience | Definitions | Misconceptions managers have about open source | How to communicate open source benefits to business managers | Neutral collaboration: Stories from organizations like LF Energy’s OpenSTEF | Creating a living document that evolves with community input
31-
Open source in modern business | Implementation strategies for business-driven | Addressing security concerns and support availability | Simplifying complex concepts for managerial understanding | Real-life examples to cluster open source suppliers to assess if they are open source first | Recap of the guide’s key points
32-
Carl-Eric Mols' “Principles for Industrial Open Source” | Connecting the two perspectives for a holistic approach | Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) when publishing software | resources for managers to engage with open source effectively | Real-life examples that shares a system that enables organizations  to asses “What do I want to reach by open-sourcing this?” |  
33-
Magnus presentation at FOSSNorth |   | How to properly budget or allocate resources for OSPOs? |   |   |  
34-
Mozilla archetypes and Heather Meeker’s frameworks |   |   |   |   |  
35-
3625
> To learn more about outline updates please visit the dedicated GH Discussions repo [here](https://github.com/todogroup/ospology/discussions/481)
3726
38-
3927
## How can people contribute to date?
4028

4129
We are using TODO Touchpoints to allow people to share 5-minute presentations on potential content to include. If you’d like to participate, please consider joining the upcoming touchpoint call on the last Thursday of November 28th

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)