Skip to content

Conversation

@jonasbardino
Copy link
Contributor

Change one for-loop to use C89-style prior variable init to remove last critical splint error and make lint action pass.
Not ideal if it prevents eventual move to C99 standards, but AFAICT we do use C89 variable declarations in all other locations. So it's no big deal at the moment and does add consistency.

@jonasbardino jonasbardino self-assigned this Aug 7, 2025
@jonasbardino jonasbardino added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 7, 2025
…or and

make lint action pass.
Not ideal if it prevents eventual move to C99 standards, but AFAICT we do use
C89 variable declarations in all other locations. So it's no big deal at the
moment and does add consistency.
@jonasbardino jonasbardino force-pushed the adjust/pam-nss-c-ext-lint-int-c99-loop-var-declaration branch from 32980f6 to 03f2beb Compare August 7, 2025 09:05
@jonasbardino jonasbardino merged commit b5e7719 into next Aug 7, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@jonasbardino jonasbardino deleted the adjust/pam-nss-c-ext-lint-int-c99-loop-var-declaration branch August 7, 2025 09:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants