Alternative for releaseable? that doesn't always evaluate to true.

[EvenMoreIrrelevance]

Due to how satisfies? works and due to Object and nil implementations being defined for Release, release? effectively is a clone of any? under any sensible circumstances.

Simply altering releaseable? is a breaking change, so this pull request introduces a nontrivially-releaseable? fn which checks if the object isn't nil and if its implementation is different from Object's and a note about it in release?'s docs.

[blueberry]

I won't be able to look at this in the next couple of weeks, but will look at it and consider it after that. Thanks for being patient.

Can you please see how it's used in other uncomplicate code? Maybe releasable can be re-defined to match your intentions with nontrivially-releaseable?

[EvenMoreIrrelevance]

Searching for releaseable?, releaseable_QMARK_ or looking for usages of (satisfies? Releaseable ...) didn't yield any usage results in all uncomplicate repos (somewhat expected honestly).

[blueberry]

Then I guess it's a vestige of some long-gone code...