Skip to content

[Misc] Cherry pick #1749 #1755 from v0.9.1-dev #1826

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Potabk
Copy link
Contributor

@Potabk Potabk commented Jul 16, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it?

Cherry pick #1749 #1755 from v0.9.1-dev

Co-authored-by: zouyida zouyida@huawei.com
Co-authored-by: zzzzwwjj 1183291235@qq.com
Co-authored-by: wangli wangli858794774@gmail.com

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

How was this patch tested?

@Potabk Potabk changed the title [Misc] Cherry pick #1749 from v0.9.1-dev [Misc] Cherry pick #1749 #1755 from v0.9.1-dev Jul 16, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.36%. Comparing base (8cfd257) to head (6700640).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
vllm_ascend/ops/fused_moe.py 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
vllm_ascend/quantization/quantizer.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (0.00%) is below the target coverage (100.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1826      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   60.17%   60.36%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files          71       71              
  Lines        7989     7975      -14     
==========================================
+ Hits         4807     4814       +7     
+ Misses       3182     3161      -21     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 60.36% <0.00%> (+0.19%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Potabk added 4 commits July 21, 2025 15:32
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
dist.all_gather(list(chunk_hidden_states), e_hidden_states,
self.tp_group)
final_hidden_states = torch.cat(chunk_hidden_states, dim=0)
if fused_moe_state != FusedMoEState.AllGather:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did you drop the consideration of the AllGatherEP and NaiveMulticast states?

cc @ganyi1996ppo @zzzzwwjj

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants