Skip to content

Conversation

Pr0Wh1teGivee
Copy link
Contributor

@Pr0Wh1teGivee Pr0Wh1teGivee commented Aug 28, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it?

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

How was this patch tested?

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a minor refactoring in the _combine_postprocess method within vllm_ascend/ops/moe_dispatcher/token_dispatcher.py. The change simplifies the code by combining a variable assignment and a return statement into a single line. This is a good stylistic improvement that makes the code more concise. The change is functionally correct and I found no issues.

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM Ascend project. The following points will speed up your PR merge:‌‌

  • A PR should do only one thing, smaller PRs enable faster reviews.
  • Every PR should include unit tests and end-to-end tests ‌to ensure it works and is not broken by other future PRs.
  • Write the commit message by fulfilling the PR description to help reviewer and future developers understand.

If CI fails, you can run linting and testing checks locally according Contributing and Testing.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.40%. Comparing base (dfc7eb3) to head (0e4ed61).
⚠️ Report is 68 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2620      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.40%   72.40%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         146      146              
  Lines       21598    21597       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        15639    15638       -1     
  Misses       5959     5959              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 72.40% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 8, 2025

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

@wangxiyuan wangxiyuan closed this Sep 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants