-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9k
[Model] Update pooling model interface #21058
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
DarkLight1337
merged 10 commits into
vllm-project:main
from
DarkLight1337:model-use-pooler
Jul 17, 2025
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ade3090
[Model] Update pooling model interface
DarkLight1337 4805bc6
Fix return type annotation
DarkLight1337 a954738
Fixes
DarkLight1337 737fc59
Fix
DarkLight1337 9984479
Fix a typo
DarkLight1337 0861b82
Fix interface detection
DarkLight1337 378dab0
Fixes
DarkLight1337 335441c
Fix name
DarkLight1337 ebbe733
Proper inheritance
DarkLight1337 495a29d
Fix interfaces detection
DarkLight1337 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the intended use of
get_pooling_params()
? Will it get called fromserving_embedding.py
somehow?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It will be called by:
LLMEngine
(and its async version) to validate that the request is supported by the model.use_cross_encoder
andlogits_processing_needs_token_ids
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
task
will be set by our code at API levelUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For example:
task="score"
LLMEngine
: Callget_pooling_params
with the task to see if it's supportedget_pooling_params
to passuse_cross_encoder
to the pooler.This abstraction lets each model define how to handle each task, instead of having static logic at the API level
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this is good, we're starting to accumulate too much logic at the entrypoint level.
Just to understand the last detail: is
EmbeddingCompetionRequest.to_pooling_params()
going to be replaced with something likeEmbeddingCompetionRequest.to_pooling_task()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, since we still have some parameters (e.g.
dimensions
) that need to be forwarded. I will add atask
attribute toPoolingParams
so that the task can be set into_pooling_params